Conversation
|
Needs working group sign-off, added to list for next meeting. |
|
🙄 when is it going to be? |
|
There's no date at the moment, and there's still feedback from the last working group meeting we need to address. Will try to work on that this evening/this weekend to further it along. |
|
._. sounds beurocratic to me. Now that means that my whole PR which implements |
Perksey
left a comment
Perksey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually on second glance this seems fine and is a continuation of the already-approved message of "like Scalar but with Vectors". The main thing I was concerned about in the details of the bitshifts, but it looks like there were addressed in the last meeting. Approving
2 participants
Summary of the PR
Updates to proposals