Conversation
|
the motive is to stop opening new tabs right ? Anything extra this is doing ? |
|
Its not to prevent opening in new tab. Read about the risk of not adding it here |
ahh...make sense. What is the behavior of this PR when externallinktarget is |
|
As you can see in this PR commit #4769018, if the dev forgot to add the Does it make sense? |
|
I read the description already. What I was asking is whats the behavior of having both |
|
Well, its required only for |
|
SO if |
|
|
|
ohh.....I got it. Ok this is a valid fix. Could You rebase and fix the conflicts. And then we are good to go 👍 |
|
Resolved the conflicts. |
Summary
Fixes #914
Had raiesed an issue #914 on missing rel="noreferrer noopener" for links opening in new tab/window and done the fix with 'noopener' for links with
_blank. Thought not to add 'noreferrer' as it might be useful for referrer info.What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
If changing the UI of default theme, please provide the before/after screenshot:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)
If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:
fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)You have tested in the following browsers: (Providing a detailed version will be better.)
If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:
To avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a feature request issue first and wait for approval before working on it.
Other information:
libdirectory.