This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 26, 2019. It is now read-only.
Basic implementation of symlink traversal #293
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Can you rebase and retrigger a build of this PR ? |
SamMousa
force-pushed
the
fix-symlink-traversal
branch
from
20dfdd1 to
51a331b
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Think I did it; first time so double check :) |
Member
|
Thanks ! |
joelwurtz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #292; this is a naive implementation that always traverses (directory) symlinks