Conversation
KostyaSha
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2019
Contributor
|
🎉 |
|
I know this was merged up before 3.2.0-rc2, but the pain of managing netty dependency conflicts is real. Can we get the transport-okhttp added to an rc3 or a 3.3 pre release soonish? |
|
@KostyaSha Since you seem to be the release manager, can you give us an idea on whether this is feasible for an rc3? |
Member
Author
|
@jshook we're working on rc3 and will release shortly after :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of the OkHttp transport from http://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java
OkHttp provides a lightweight API, supports the same feature set as Netty does but also has Windows Npipe support since it can use Java's Socket abstraction.
This change is