Use stream functions in pipelines. (Closes #1777)#1814
Merged
Conversation
brollb
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2020
Contributor
brollb
left a comment
brollb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks good! Nice work. This is also great to have so we can support larger data in pipelines!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit adds stream support function added in #1702 for pipeline
execution as well as Interactive Compute router. build job utils
now uses webgme-engine module in webgme/node_modules. This will
add the support for streams in blobclient.