Skip to content

feat: Add 'enforce' and 'enhance' to imperative verbs list#359

Merged
shenxianpeng merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/update-imperatives
Feb 1, 2026
Merged

feat: Add 'enforce' and 'enhance' to imperative verbs list#359
shenxianpeng merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/update-imperatives

Conversation

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Feb 1, 2026

No description provided.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2026 19:32
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 1, 2026
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for commit-check ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7d10f66
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/commit-check/deploys/697faa49fe8eca0008d31eb8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-359--commit-check.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@shenxianpeng has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/update-imperatives

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 65e3fba into main Feb 1, 2026
15 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the chore/update-imperatives branch February 1, 2026 19:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.35%. Comparing base (c169d35) to head (7d10f66).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #359      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.22%   94.35%   +1.12%     
==========================================
  Files           8        9       +1     
  Lines         694      797     +103     
==========================================
+ Hits          647      752     +105     
+ Misses         47       45       -2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 57.68%

❌ 17 regressed benchmarks
✅ 137 untouched benchmarks
🆕 11 new benchmarks
⏩ 108 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
🆕 test_cli_allow_merge_commits_false N/A 5.1 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_subject_imperative_false N/A 5.6 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_allow_commit_types N/A 5.1 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_subject_imperative_true N/A 5 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_overrides_env N/A 5.6 ms N/A
🆕 test_env_subject_imperative N/A 5 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_subject_max_length N/A 5.1 ms N/A
🆕 test_env_overrides_default N/A 5.1 ms N/A
🆕 test_cli_multiple_args_combined N/A 5.9 ms N/A
❌ test_author_name_validation 2.6 ms 3.6 ms -27.75%
🆕 test_env_subject_max_length N/A 5.1 ms N/A
🆕 test_env_allow_commit_types N/A 5.1 ms N/A
❌ test_dry_run_always_passes 2.3 ms 3.2 ms -27.57%
❌ test_author_email_validation 2.6 ms 3.6 ms -27.48%
❌ test_help 2.2 ms 5.3 ms -57.68%
❌ test_version 1.1 ms 2 ms -44.71%
❌ test_main_error_handling_subprocess_failure 2.5 ms 3.5 ms -29.19%
❌ test_message_validation_from_file 3.7 ms 4.8 ms -22.4%
❌ test_branch_validation 2.8 ms 3.8 ms -26.48%
❌ test_message_validation_with_invalid_commit 4.1 ms 5.1 ms -19.8%
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Comparing chore/update-imperatives (7d10f66) with main (c169d35)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 108 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on main (f1a4704) during the generation of this report, so c169d35 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@shenxianpeng