Skip to content

chore: Update imperatives.py #311

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
shenxianpeng wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: Update imperatives.py #311

shenxianpeng wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for "bump" as a recognized commit type.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2025 19:35
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for commit-check ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f5c43f3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/commit-check/deploys/68f68f0cd4e6b30008b006ee
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-311--commit-check.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Added "bump" to the IMPERATIVES collection in commit_check/imperatives.py. The string was inserted after "build" within the IMPERATIVES set with no changes to logic or control flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
IMPERATIVES constant update
commit_check/imperatives.py		 Added "bump" string to the IMPERATIVES set, positioned after "build"

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A bump in the road, a string in the set,
Imperatives grow, no logic upset!
Simple and clean, a hop and a bound,
Commit conventions, now more sound! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title "chore: Update imperatives.py" is related to the changeset in that it correctly identifies the file that was modified. However, the title uses vague and generic language—specifically the term "Update"—without clarifying what the actual change is. A teammate reviewing the commit history would see only that imperatives.py was updated, but would not understand from the title alone that the specific change was adding "bump" to the IMPERATIVES collection. The title fails to clearly summarize the main change or specify the nature of the update. Consider revising the title to be more specific about what changed. A more descriptive title such as "chore: Add bump to imperatives" or "chore: Add bump imperative" would clearly communicate the main change and make it easier for teammates to understand the PR's intent at a glance.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch shenxianpeng-patch-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Oct 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 126bf34 and f5c43f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • commit_check/imperatives.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run benchmarks

commit_check/imperatives.py
"authorize",
"break",
"build",
"bump"
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Oct 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Missing comma causes string concatenation.

Line 25 is missing a trailing comma after "bump". In Python, adjacent string literals without a separator are automatically concatenated, so "bump" "cache" becomes "bumpcache". This means the IMPERATIVES set will contain "bumpcache" instead of separate "bump" and "cache" entries.

Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:

-    "bump"
+    "bump",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"bump"
"bump",
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents 
In commit_check/imperatives.py around line 25 the string "bump" is missing a
trailing comma which causes Python to concatenate adjacent string literals
(e.g., "bump" "cache" -> "bumpcache"); fix this by adding a comma after "bump"
so the IMPERATIVES set contains separate entries (i.e., "bump", "cache").

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #311 will degrade performances by 39.84%

Comparing shenxianpeng-patch-2 (f5c43f3) with main (126bf34)

Summary

❌ 1 regression
✅ 155 untouched
⏩ 85 skipped1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
❌ test_main_with_message_empty_string_no_stdin_with_git 4.7 ms 7.7 ms -39.84%

Footnotes

  1. 85 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the shenxianpeng-patch-2 branch October 20, 2025 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shenxianpeng