Skip to content

Conversation

@SirCortly
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds v4→v5 migration for zero_trust_access_service_token.

Renames deprecated resource type `access_service_token` -> `zero_trust_access_service_token` 

Removes deprecated field `min_days_for_renewal`
Converts field `client_secret_version` from int -> float64

@SirCortly SirCortly requested a review from tamas-jozsa October 31, 2025 17:56
@SirCortly SirCortly force-pushed the cortlyons/migrate-zero-trust-access-service-token branch 4 times, most recently from 167a4bf to a06a4d3 Compare October 31, 2025 21:45
@SirCortly SirCortly marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 21:47
@SirCortly SirCortly requested a review from a team October 31, 2025 21:50
@SirCortly SirCortly force-pushed the cortlyons/migrate-zero-trust-access-service-token branch from a06a4d3 to 615c969 Compare November 3, 2025 18:59
"attributes": {
"account_id": "f037e56e89293a057740de681ac9abbe",
"client_id": "123456.access",
"client_secret": "123456",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would the client secret exist in the state file?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I generated the state file by running a terraform apply on the input .tf file, so I think so, I thought it was a bit strange as well.

@SirCortly SirCortly force-pushed the cortlyons/migrate-zero-trust-access-service-token branch from 615c969 to 3bc6e2f Compare November 3, 2025 21:00
@SirCortly SirCortly force-pushed the cortlyons/migrate-zero-trust-access-service-token branch from 3bc6e2f to a952326 Compare November 3, 2025 22:12
@tamas-jozsa tamas-jozsa merged commit 4943ea0 into main Nov 5, 2025
7 checks passed
@tamas-jozsa tamas-jozsa deleted the cortlyons/migrate-zero-trust-access-service-token branch November 5, 2025 10:56
@vaishakdinesh vaishakdinesh added this to the Phase 1 milestone Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants