|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: "Week 3: Ideastrike" |
| 4 | +author: "@tobin" |
| 5 | +comments: true |
| 6 | +date: 2012-01-17 |
| 7 | +--- |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +##This week's idea |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Two weeks down, and the momentum is strong - we've got a packed room over at [Jabbr](http://jabbr.net/#/rooms/code52), we've been featured on the [Github blog](https://github.com/blog/1024-a-new-coding-project-every-week-at-code52), and we've got two projects that are going strong. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +So now we're on to week three, and another idea from our community - [Ideastrike!](https://github.com/Code52/Ideastrike) (code to go up soon ;)) |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Basically, our aim this week is to create a great site to give ideas and feedback, focusing on software development and good integration with other tooling. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +There are many feedback and voting mechanism for ideas, but we think we can provide an open-source alternative, that is feature rich, simple, but powerful, and will be a great asset for the small guys trying to get started on projects. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +We've got a [Trello board](https://trello.com/board/ideastrike/4f137b417201526045146b8a) set up for it which we'll be keeping in sync with jobs from our Github issues as we get them scheduled and assigned. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +##What platform are we looking at? |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Well, we've had a lot of feedback this week about this being a ".NET only" group - we don't intend it to be that way, but as it was said on [The West Wing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_West_Wing) - "Decisions are made by those who show up". |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +We're looking for the primary group to start working with an ASP.NET framework - [Nancy](https://github.com/NancyFx/Nancy) as it's what some of us are familiar with, and what we think others with .NET experience will get up to speed on quicky. We also benefit from two [exceptional](https://twitter.com/grumpydev) [guys](https://twitter.com/thecodejunkie) who have been, and we hope will be, stopping by to offer support and advice. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +That being said, if some of the other communities out there - be it Java, Ruby, Python, Node.JS, Haskell, Erlang or Perl want to get involved - stop by, help us make decisions, and gather a group and code. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +We're happy to *have* help, we're happy *to* help. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +One idea we've had is if we collaboratively work on a set of specifications, so we can jointly create something that works cross-platform, for different scenarios and different communities - but a shared reference. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +We're happy to discuss it, to offer support, publicity where we can, but what we need is - if you're serious about contributing and you want to make this more than just about .NET, we need you to show up. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +##So what now? |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +We'll be getting some code set up on the github in the next 24 hours, and discussing approaches and drawing up a battle plan in the chatroom - if you've got ideas you want, come in and discuss them with us (ping @aeoth, @shifty and @tobin in the room please), or leave a message on this blog post. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Get into the chatroom at [JabbR](http://jabbr.net/#/rooms/code52) and join in on the fun! |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +-- Code52 team |
0 commit comments