|
6 | 6 | <atom:link href="http://www.Code52.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> |
7 | 7 | <description></description> |
8 | 8 | <language>en-au</language> |
9 | | - <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:29:00 +1100</pubDate> |
10 | | - <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:29:00 +1100</lastBuildDate> |
| 9 | + <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:46:48 +1100</pubDate> |
| 10 | + <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:46:48 +1100</lastBuildDate> |
11 | 11 |
|
12 | 12 |
|
13 | 13 | <item> |
|
18 | 18 | <guid>http://www.Code52.org/introduction</guid> |
19 | 19 | <description><p>I don't know which one of my co-conspirators came up with the idea, but it all started with a simple premise:</p> |
20 | 20 |
|
21 | | -<p>"A new project every week"</p> |
| 21 | +<p><strong>"A new coding project every week"</strong></p> |
22 | 22 |
|
23 | | -<p>Madness! Surely it couldn't be possible. What would that even involve? I had so many questions, but as we discussed it we started to come to something resembling an agreement.</p> |
| 23 | +<p>Madness! Surely it couldn't be possible. What would that even involve?</p> |
24 | 24 |
|
25 | | -<p>We wanted:</p> |
| 25 | +<p>I had so many questions, but as we discussed it we started to come to something resembling an agreement.</p> |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +<p>We wanted to:</p> |
26 | 28 |
|
27 | 29 | <ul> |
28 | | -<li>to introduce more developers to open-source projects and help them learn the ropes.</li> |
29 | | -<li>to create a community that encouraged contributions across a broad range of technologies.</li> |
30 | | -<li>to work on projects which both the creators and community want to improve.</li> |
| 30 | +<li>introduce more developers to open-source projects and help them learn the ropes.</li> |
| 31 | +<li>foster a community that encouraged contributions across a range of technologies.</li> |
| 32 | +<li>work on projects which the community want to improve.</li> |
31 | 33 | </ul> |
32 | 34 |
|
33 | 35 |
|
34 | 36 | <p> Of course, that doesn't get away from the original question I had.</p> |
35 | 37 |
|
36 | 38 | <p> <strong>Why a week?</strong></p> |
37 | 39 |
|
38 | | -<p> Depending on your perspective, a week may be a long time - or it may not. This is still a contentious point within our group, but a week suits me because:</p> |
| 40 | +<p> A week isn't a long time - or it may be, depending on your perspective. This is still a somewhat contentious point within our group, but a week suits me because:</p> |
39 | 41 |
|
40 | 42 | <ul> |
41 | 43 | <li>shorter timelines encourage achievable goals.</li> |
42 | 44 | <li>shorter timelines reduce the incentive to procrastinate.</li> |
43 | 45 | <li>more variety of projects to work on - something different each week.</li> |
44 | | -<li><p>with good organisation (i.e. us having our shit together), each week should be productive out of the gate.</p></li> |
45 | | -<li><p>lots of projects out there are in need of contributons</p></li> |
46 | | -<li>people have good ideas</li> |
| 46 | +<li>with good organisation (i.e. us having our shit together), each week should be productive out of the gate.</li> |
| 47 | +</ul> |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +<p> And yes, we're anticipating some hurdles getting something like this off the ground.</p> |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +<p> <strong>What sort of hurdles?</strong></p> |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +<p>Given the variety of backgrounds and skillsets that developers have, we need to keep in mind:</p> |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +<ul> |
| 57 | +<li>how do we determine which projects to work on</li> |
| 58 | +<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control">DVCS</a> is still a very new concept - how can we help getting new developers familiar with it</li> |
47 | 59 | </ul> |
48 | 60 |
|
49 | 61 | </description> |
|
0 commit comments