Skip to content

Conversation

@aalhossary
Copy link
Member

Apparently it affects only cryo-EM entries.

Partially Fixes #1000
It fixes the PDBFileParser.
Before fixing the mmCifParser we need first to check whether the files should be remediated or not.

Apparently it affects only cryo-EM entries.
@aalhossary aalhossary changed the title Parsing REMARK 2 and REMARK 3 (new format) Parsing resolution values in PDB (REMARK 2 and REMARK 3 [new format]) and mmCif Dec 2, 2021
@aalhossary
Copy link
Member Author

I parsed the mmCif data from _em_3d_reconstruction.resolution and skipped the _refine.ls_d_res_high if it is not defined.

Copy link
Member

@sbittrich sbittrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes, LGTM.
1 small remark below.

the safer condition covers both UNKNOWN and NOT_PRESENT values
@aalhossary
Copy link
Member Author

I fixed that. However, there is a new question in #1000 that needs answer before we close that issue and this PR.

@aalhossary
Copy link
Member Author

Is it fine now? Shall I merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@josemduarte josemduarte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one more minor comment. After that it's ok to merge.

@aalhossary aalhossary merged commit dcdd364 into biojava:master Dec 8, 2021
@aalhossary aalhossary deleted the fix_1000_Resolution_lost_in_cryo-EM branch December 8, 2021 23:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolution lost in cryo-EM

3 participants