[SDK-3196] Rewrite with Authlib rather than python-jose#58
[SDK-3196] Rewrite with Authlib rather than python-jose#58adamjmcgrath wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
adamjmcgrath
changed the title
adamjmcgrath
added
review:medium
adamjmcgrath
force-pushed
the
pyvnext-rewrite
branch
from
1b4ed84 to
bcbe651
Compare
|
Added some unit tests because I had some around anyway and was able to reduce the validator code because Authlib 1.0 is out |
|
Am going to leave this in draft mode for a bit so I can point the old QS to master and the new QS to this |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you have not received a response for our team (apologies for the delay) and this is still a blocker, please reply with additional information or just a ping. Thank you for your contribution! 🙇♂️ |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you have not received a response for our team (apologies for the delay) and this is still a blocker, please reply with additional information or just a ping. Thank you for your contribution! 🙇♂️ |
4 participants
Authlib 0.x provides middleware that protects Flask APIs with https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6750 - so we can remove all the code that gets the Bearer Token and Issues spec compliant errors.
When Authlib 1.x is released we can remove
validator.pyas this will include it's own JWTBearerValidator