The base CSS for astropy.org starts with a definition that basically removes useful HTML formatting tags like <it>, <sup>, <strong> etc. I understand wanting to have a highly uniform and simplified look, but it seems like this is going too far. In particular now I want to use <sup> and it isn't possible. This is something that a SO post specifically discouraged from doing with pure CSS.
/* http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/
v2.0 | 20110126
License: none (public domain)
*/
html, body, div, span, applet, object, iframe,
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre,
a, abbr, acronym, address, big, cite, code,
del, dfn, em, img, ins, kbd, q, s, samp,
small, strike, strong, sub, sup, tt, var,
b, u, i, center,
dl, dt, dd, ol, ul, li,
fieldset, form, label, legend,
table, caption, tbody, tfoot, thead, tr, th, td,
article, aside, canvas, details, embed,
figure, figcaption, footer, header, hgroup,
menu, nav, output, ruby, section, summary,
time, mark, audio, video {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
font-size: 100%;
font: inherit;
vertical-align: baseline;
}
The base CSS for astropy.org starts with a definition that basically removes useful HTML formatting tags like
<it>, <sup>, <strong>etc. I understand wanting to have a highly uniform and simplified look, but it seems like this is going too far. In particular now I want to use<sup>and it isn't possible. This is something that a SO post specifically discouraged from doing with pure CSS.Would there be a problem with liberating a few of these?
@astrofrog @eteq