⚡️ Speed up function encode_query by 19%#13
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Conversation
Impact: high Impact_explanation: Looking at this optimization report, I need to assess several key factors: ## Performance Analysis **Overall Runtime Details:** - Original: 5.96ms → Optimized: 5.02ms - 18.65% speedup with millisecond-level runtimes indicates meaningful improvement **Generated Tests Results:** The optimization shows strong performance gains, particularly for large-scale operations: - `test_encode_query_large_list_of_primitives`: 100% speedup (232μs → 116μs) - `test_encode_query_large_list_of_dicts`: 59.4% speedup (667μs → 419μs) - `test_encode_query_large_flat_dict`: 30.5% speedup (472μs → 362μs) - Most other tests show consistent 5-15% improvements **Existing Tests Results:** - Most tests show positive speedups ranging from 2.36% to 14.4% - Only very small edge cases (empty query, none query) show minor regressions of 2-20%, but these are in the nanosecond range and negligible in practice - The complex and realistic test cases show solid 9-14% improvements **Replay Tests Results:** - Mixed results with some regressions, but the positive cases show meaningful 4-8% improvements - The regressions appear to be on very small workloads (microsecond range) ## Hot Path Analysis The `calling_fn_details` shows that `encode_query` is called in the HTTP client's `request()` and `stream()` methods - these are core networking functions that are likely called frequently in any application using this SDK. This places the function squarely in a hot path where even modest improvements get multiplied across many invocations. ## Assessment This optimization demonstrates: 1. **Consistent meaningful speedups** (18.65% overall) on realistic workloads 2. **Exceptional performance on large-scale operations** (59-100% improvements) 3. **Location in a critical hot path** (HTTP request processing) 4. **Asymptotic benefits** that scale with data size 5. **Minimal negative impact** on edge cases The combination of solid percentage improvements, hot path location, and scaling benefits for larger workloads makes this a high-impact optimization. END OF IMPACT EXPLANATION The optimized code achieves an 18% speedup through several micro-optimizations that reduce Python's overhead in hot code paths: **Key Optimizations:** 1. **Cached type/function lookups**: The code binds frequently used types and methods (`_BaseModel`, `_isBaseModel`, `dict_type`, `result_append`, `result_extend`) as local variables to avoid repeated attribute lookups during execution. In Python, local variable access is faster than attribute access. 2. **Streamlined type checking**: Instead of separate `isinstance` calls for `pydantic.BaseModel` and `dict`, the code uses a more efficient conditional expression pattern that reduces redundant type checks. 3. **Method binding for list operations**: By binding `result.append` and `result.extend` to local variables, the code avoids method lookup overhead in tight loops where these operations are called frequently. **Performance Impact by Test Case:** - **Large-scale operations benefit most**: The `test_encode_query_large_list_of_primitives` shows 100% speedup and `test_encode_query_large_list_of_dicts` shows 59% speedup, indicating the optimizations are particularly effective for bulk operations. - **Recursive/nested structures**: Tests with nested dicts and lists of dicts show 10-15% improvements, benefiting from reduced overhead in recursive calls. - **Simple cases see modest gains**: Basic flat dictionaries show 5-12% improvements, demonstrating the optimizations don't hurt simple cases while providing significant benefits for complex ones. The optimizations are most effective for workloads with large lists, nested structures, or frequent recursive calls to `single_query_encoder`, which matches the 43.7% time spent in `.dict()` calls shown in the original profiler results.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 19% (0.19x) speedup for
encode_queryinsrc/deepgram/core/query_encoder.py⏱️ Runtime :
5.96 milliseconds→5.02 milliseconds(best of145runs)📝 Explanation and details
Impact: high
Impact_explanation: Looking at this optimization report, I need to assess several key factors:
Performance Analysis
Overall Runtime Details:
Generated Tests Results:
The optimization shows strong performance gains, particularly for large-scale operations:
test_encode_query_large_list_of_primitives: 100% speedup (232μs → 116μs)test_encode_query_large_list_of_dicts: 59.4% speedup (667μs → 419μs)test_encode_query_large_flat_dict: 30.5% speedup (472μs → 362μs)Existing Tests Results:
Replay Tests Results:
Hot Path Analysis
The
calling_fn_detailsshows thatencode_queryis called in the HTTP client'srequest()andstream()methods - these are core networking functions that are likely called frequently in any application using this SDK. This places the function squarely in a hot path where even modest improvements get multiplied across many invocations.Assessment
This optimization demonstrates:
The combination of solid percentage improvements, hot path location, and scaling benefits for larger workloads makes this a high-impact optimization.
END OF IMPACT EXPLANATION
The optimized code achieves an 18% speedup through several micro-optimizations that reduce Python's overhead in hot code paths:
Key Optimizations:
Cached type/function lookups: The code binds frequently used types and methods (
_BaseModel,_isBaseModel,dict_type,result_append,result_extend) as local variables to avoid repeated attribute lookups during execution. In Python, local variable access is faster than attribute access.Streamlined type checking: Instead of separate
isinstancecalls forpydantic.BaseModelanddict, the code uses a more efficient conditional expression pattern that reduces redundant type checks.Method binding for list operations: By binding
result.appendandresult.extendto local variables, the code avoids method lookup overhead in tight loops where these operations are called frequently.Performance Impact by Test Case:
test_encode_query_large_list_of_primitivesshows 100% speedup andtest_encode_query_large_list_of_dictsshows 59% speedup, indicating the optimizations are particularly effective for bulk operations.The optimizations are most effective for workloads with large lists, nested structures, or frequent recursive calls to
single_query_encoder, which matches the 43.7% time spent in.dict()calls shown in the original profiler results.✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
unit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_complex_queryunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_empty_queryunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_none_queryunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_query_with_pydantic_modelsunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_query_with_special_valuesunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestEncodeQuery.test_simple_queryunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestQueryEncoderEdgeCases.test_circular_reference_protectionunit/test_core_query_encoder.py::TestQueryEncoderEdgeCases.test_unicode_and_special_charactersutils/test_query_encoding.py::test_encode_query_with_noneutils/test_query_encoding.py::test_query_encoding_deep_object_arraysutils/test_query_encoding.py::test_query_encoding_deep_objects🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime
test_pytest_testsunittest_agent_v1_models_py_testsintegrationstest_advanced_features_py_testsutilstest_se__replay_test_0.py::test_src_deepgram_core_query_encoder_encode_querytest_pytest_testsunittest_core_query_encoder_py__replay_test_0.py::test_src_deepgram_core_query_encoder_encode_querytest_pytest_testsunittest_http_internals_py_testsintegrationstest_agent_client_py_testsunittest_telemetry__replay_test_0.py::test_src_deepgram_core_query_encoder_encode_querytest_pytest_testsunittest_listen_v1_models_py_testsunittest_telemetry_models_py_testsintegrationstest_rea__replay_test_0.py::test_src_deepgram_core_query_encoder_encode_querytest_pytest_testsutilstest_query_encoding_py_testsintegrationstest_auth_client_py_testsunittest_core_mode__replay_test_0.py::test_src_deepgram_core_query_encoder_encode_query🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_5p92pe1r/tmpb8127hc2/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_encode_querycodeflash_concolic_5p92pe1r/tmpb8127hc2/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_encode_query_2To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-encode_query-mgul9vz0and push.