Skip to content

Update Appwrite description to include Sites, add MCP to products list#9867

Merged
eldadfux merged 9 commits intomainfrom
update-readme
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

Update Appwrite description to include Sites, add MCP to products list#9867
eldadfux merged 9 commits intomainfrom
update-readme

Conversation

@ebenezerdon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ebenezerdon ebenezerdon commented May 22, 2025

What does this PR do?

Updates README to mention integrated hosting solution, Sites.

  • Adds MCP and Sites to Products section

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated product descriptions to emphasize full-stack development and integrated hosting.
    • Added new entries for "MCP" and "Sites" products.
    • Renamed "Getting Started" to "Installation & Setup" in the Table of Contents and section header.
    • Improved formatting and whitespace in the One-Click Setups section.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The README.md and README-CN.md files were updated to expand the Appwrite platform description, consolidate links, correct a Table of Contents anchor, clean whitespace, and add two new product entries: MCP and Sites. These changes are documentation-only with no modifications to code, SDKs, or architecture.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md, README-CN.md Expanded Appwrite description to include native app support and integrated hosting; consolidated links; corrected TOC anchor; cleaned whitespace; added MCP and Sites product entries.

Poem

🐇
In README fields where updates grow,
Two links unite, descriptions flow.
MCP and Sites now join the crew,
Clean anchors guide you straight and true.
With whitespace trimmed and docs refined,
The rabbit hops with peace of mind!

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b8aa15 and fed881a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Projects)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (VCS)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Migrations)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Realtime)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Webhooks)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Storage)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Users)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Teams)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Tokens)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (GraphQL)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Proxy)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Functions)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Databases)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Console)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Account)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Avatars)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Dev Keys)
  • GitHub Check: E2E General Test
  • GitHub Check: Unit Test
  • GitHub Check: scan

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented May 22, 2025

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
binutils 2.42-r0 CVE-2025-0840 HIGH
libexpat 2.6.4-r0 CVE-2024-8176 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2024-56171 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-24928 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-27113 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32414 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32415 HIGH
sqlite-libs 3.45.3-r1 CVE-2025-29087 HIGH
xz 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
xz-libs 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57ee69a and e27f1e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
  • GitHub Check: scan
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
🔇 Additional comments (7)
README.md (7)

1-1: Consolidated header links improve readability.

Merging the two top-level links into a single blockquote makes the welcome banner cleaner and keeps key calls-to-action grouped together.


27-27: Project description updated to emphasize full-stack platform.

The new wording accurately shifts “backend server” to “end-to-end platform” and highlights the integrated hosting solution. This aligns with the PR’s goal of reflecting Appwrite’s scope.


131-131: Whitespace-only adjustment around the Gitpod integration logo; no action needed.


137-137: Whitespace-only adjustment around the Akamai Compute integration logo; no action needed.


143-143: Whitespace-only adjustment around the AWS Marketplace integration logo; no action needed.


189-189: MCP entry added correctly.

The new MCP product link and description succinctly communicate its purpose. Link path and formatting look good.


190-190: Sites entry added correctly.

The Sites product is clearly described, and the link targets the appropriate documentation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README-CN.md (1)

183-183: 建议优化“站点”描述的流畅度
当前描述“直接从 Appwrite 开发、部署和扩展您的 Web 应用程序,与您的后端一起。”可酌情改为:

直接在 Appwrite 中开发、部署并与后端服务无缝集成您的 Web 应用程序
以提升可读性和表达准确性。

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e27f1e1 and f306e5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README-CN.md (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (19)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Migrations)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Webhooks)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Teams)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Messaging)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Sites)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Proxy)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (FunctionsSchedule)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Projects)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (GraphQL)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Functions)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Locale)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Avatars)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Account)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Databases)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Dev Keys)
  • GitHub Check: Unit Test
  • GitHub Check: E2E General Test
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: scan
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README-CN.md (2)

29-29: 文档精准度:引言段落更新
中文翻译准确地反映了英文版本中新增的“完全集成托管解决方案”内容,语义清晰,风格一致。


182-182:

Details

✅ Verification successful

请验证 MCP 文档链接
请确认该链接在中文站点是否有效,且路径是否与英文 README 中保持一致(docs/tooling/mcp vs docs/products/mcp)。


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# 验证 MCP 文档链接是否返回 200 状态码
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://appwrite.io/docs/tooling/mcp

Length of output: 81


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the MCP link in the English README
echo "MCP link occurrences in README.md:"
rg -n "docs.*mcp" README.md

# Verify that https://appwrite.io/docs/products/mcp returns 200
echo "HTTP status for https://appwrite.io/docs/products/mcp:"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://appwrite.io/docs/products/mcp

Length of output: 567


验证通过:MCP 文档链接一致且有效

  • English README (line 189) 和中文 README-CN.md (line 182) 均使用 /docs/tooling/mcp 链接
  • https://appwrite.io/docs/tooling/mcp 返回 HTTP 200,而 /docs/products/mcp 返回 404,无需修改链接。

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented May 22, 2025

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 955
  • Requests with 200 status code: 171,921
  • P99 latency: 0.198672997

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 955 1,199
200 171,921 215,783
P99 0.198672997 0.155694374

README.md Outdated
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
> [Get started with Appwrite](https://apwr.dev/appcloud)
> [Join the Init kick off event 19th of May: The future of Appwrite with Founder & CEO Eldad Fux](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g8tuogsp7A)
> [Get started with Appwrite](https://apwr.dev/appcloud) > [Join the Init kick off event 19th of May: The future of Appwrite with Founder & CEO Eldad Fux](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g8tuogsp7A)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

weird...something is wrong formatting here.

@ebenezerdon ebenezerdon requested a review from stnguyen90 May 23, 2025 10:42
@EVDOG4LIFE EVDOG4LIFE self-requested a review May 27, 2025 20:21
@eldadfux eldadfux merged commit 2acb9c5 into main Jun 18, 2025
38 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants