Skip to content

Conversation

@barjin
Copy link
Member

@barjin barjin commented Feb 9, 2026

Closes #607

@barjin barjin self-assigned this Feb 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 134th sprint - Tooling team milestone Feb 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Feb 9, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.02%. Comparing base (f9d0178) to head (3d0aa0a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #608   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.02%   76.02%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        2482     2482           
=======================================
  Hits         1887     1887           
  Misses        595      595           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 68.77% <ø> (ø)
unit 64.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@barjin
Copy link
Member Author

barjin commented Feb 9, 2026

docs build seems to be passing correctly .

@barjin barjin requested a review from vdusek February 9, 2026 09:20
Copy link
Contributor

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about

    "resolutions": {
        "@apify/ui-library": "<1.120.0"
    },

?

@vdusek vdusek changed the title chore: update website dependencies, regenerate lockfile docs: update website dependencies, regenerate lockfile Feb 9, 2026
@barjin
Copy link
Member Author

barjin commented Feb 9, 2026

Right, this PR was opened before your most recent pushes to master (and updates to the issue description 😄 )

I'll check out the current state.

@vdusek
Copy link
Contributor

vdusek commented Feb 9, 2026

Right, this PR was opened before your most recent pushes to master (and updates to the issue description 😄 )

I'll check out the current state.

Yeah sorry! You're too fast 😄 ... I thought it was fixed when Claude said so, but it actually needed more investigation and another resolution.

@vdusek vdusek marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2026 19:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs build broken by @apify/ui-library >=1.120.0 (SSG M7 module resolution error)

2 participants