feat(transpiler): handle named params#44
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a note on how function f({a=1, b=2}) {return a + b;} is transformed ?
vsavkin
force-pushed
the
fix_named_params
branch
from
f62a485 to
9a6608f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Traceur parse trees do not end with ParseTree
I think it would benefit the maintainability to conform to Traceur naming spec
vsavkin
force-pushed
the
fix_named_params
branch
from
9a6608f to
4bbbe7e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the purpose of this test? Only checking that we can add an empty object initializer, or that default values work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should call function with named params without passing any params by providing an empty object initializer
vsavkin
force-pushed
the
fix_named_params
branch
from
4bbbe7e to
be49cf0
Compare
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
3 participants
Closes #38