Repository navigation
fix(language-service): initialize static reflector correctly - #15769
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vicb
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2017
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"false; else loading" ? (keep it as simple as it the test needs)
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a regression I want it to match the original report.
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #15768
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
#15768
What is the new behavior?
Using
elseno longer causes the language service to crash.Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")