Fix(sdm): module ref issue in python components import#243
Fix(sdm): module ref issue in python components import#243aaronsteers merged 46 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
…_w_custom_components.py
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@aaronsteers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes focus on improving error handling in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Factory as ModelToComponentFactory
participant ImportLib as importlib
participant Module as Dynamic Module
Factory->>ImportLib: import_module(module_name)
alt Module Import Successful
ImportLib-->>Factory: Module Reference
Factory->>Module: Get Class
alt Class Retrieval Successful
Module-->>Factory: Class
else Class Not Found
Factory->>Factory: Raise ValueError
end
else Module Import Failed
Factory->>Factory: Raise ValueError
end
The sequence diagram illustrates the new flow of dynamically importing modules and retrieving classes, highlighting the error handling steps introduced in the changes. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (1)
Learnt from: aaronsteers
PR: airbytehq/airbyte-python-cdk#174
File: airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py:1093-1102
Timestamp: 2025-01-14T00:20:32.310Z
Learning: In the `airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py` file, the strict module name checks in `_get_class_from_fully_qualified_class_name` (requiring `module_name` to be "components" and `module_name_full` to be "source_declarative_manifest.components") are intentionally designed to provide early, clear feedback when class declarations won't be found later in execution. These restrictions may be loosened in the future if the requirements for class definition locations change.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Linters
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
[error] 1184-1184: Name "importlib" is not defined [name-defined]
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-the-guardian-api' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
|
@coderabbitai review |
1 participant
Follow-on from:
Summary by CodeRabbit