Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ConcurrentDeclarativeSource
participant StreamRetriever
User->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Initialize with stream config
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>StreamRetriever: Retrieve stream configurations
StreamRetriever-->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Return stream mappings
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Group streams
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Check incremental sync support
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>User: Stream data ready for sync
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (1)
240-240: Could we adjust the type annotations to avoid using# type: ignore?In the line where
component_definition=incremental_sync_component_definition # type: ignoreis used, would it make sense to refine the type annotations or modify the code to eliminate the need for the type ignore comment? Wdyt?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (3)
209-209: Should we ensure safe access to the stream mapping keys to prevent potential KeyErrors?
When accessing name_to_stream_mapping[declarative_stream.name]["retriever"]["type"], is there a possibility that any of these keys might be missing? Perhaps using .get() methods or adding checks could help avoid potential exceptions. Wdyt?
218-218: Is there a risk of KeyError when accessing name_to_stream_mapping[declarative_stream.name]?
Similar to the previous point, should we verify that declarative_stream.name exists in name_to_stream_mapping before accessing it directly? This might help in preventing unexpected errors. What do you think?
323-327: Great job on enhancing the method's robustness!
Accepting a nullable type for incremental_sync_component_definition and adding the null checks improves the code's reliability.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation