Replace logits_to_logprobs implementation with numpy equivalent to llama.cpp#991
Merged
abetlen merged 1 commit intoabetlen:mainfrom Dec 12, 2023
Merged
Replace logits_to_logprobs implementation with numpy equivalent to llama.cpp#991abetlen merged 1 commit intoabetlen:mainfrom
abetlen merged 1 commit intoabetlen:mainfrom
Conversation
…ama.cpp See abetlen#990. This change makes the logits_to_logprobs function equivalent to the version in the llama.cpp repository. It uses numpy so it's much faster than the previous version.
Owner
|
@player1537 perfect, thank you very much! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #990. This change makes the logits_to_logprobs function equivalent to the version in the llama.cpp repository. It uses numpy so it's much faster than the previous version.
Edit: I should add that I'm not 100% confident in this change. I'd appreciate if someone else could test this themselves too.