UN-2590 [DEPS] Bump jsonschema version#192
Merged
hari-kuriakose merged 2 commits intomainfrom Jul 9, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe version constraint for the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
hari-kuriakose
requested review from
chandrasekharan-zipstack,
gaya3-zipstack and
pk-zipstack
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Cache setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pyproject.toml(1 hunks)
chandrasekharan-zipstack
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2025
Contributor
chandrasekharan-zipstack
left a comment
chandrasekharan-zipstack
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - if you plan on releasing the changes you'll have to bump the SDK version in init.py @hari-kuriakose
gaya3-zipstack
requested changes
Jul 8, 2025
Contributor
gaya3-zipstack
left a comment
gaya3-zipstack
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SDK version needs to be upgraded too @hari-kuriakose
chore: bump sdk ver
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
jsonschemadep packageuv.lockWhy
The current version used conflicts with a dep of upcoming SDK major version bump.
How
Bumping
jsonschemadep pkg version will remove version conflicts in venv thus allowing to generateuv.locksuccessfully.Can this PR break any existing features. If yes, please list possible items. If no, please explain why. (PS: Admins do not merge the PR without this section filled)
Database Migrations
Env Config
Relevant Docs
Related Issues or PRs
Dependencies Versions
Notes on Testing
Screenshots
Checklist
I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.