Skip to content

Version roll over for qdrant client - #185

Merged
jaseemjaskp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/version-roll-over-for-qdrant
Mar 26, 2024
Merged

Version roll over for qdrant client#185
jaseemjaskp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/version-roll-over-for-qdrant

Conversation

@gaya3-vijayakumar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Version roll over for qdrant client changes

Why

How

Database Migrations

Env Config

Relevant Docs

Related Issues or PRs

Dependencies Versions

Notes on Testing

Screenshots

Checklist

I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.

@chandrasekharan-zipstack chandrasekharan-zipstack left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - the docker compose changes need to be present in unstract-cloud-platform repo as well

@jaseemjaskp
jaseemjaskp merged commit 3cd1759 into main Mar 26, 2024
@jaseemjaskp
jaseemjaskp deleted the fix/version-roll-over-for-qdrant branch March 26, 2024 09:02
pk-zipstack pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
hari-kuriakose added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
View File History crashed the page with React #185 ("Maximum update depth
exceeded"). antd tolerates an inline `rowSelection={{ selectedRowKeys,
onChange }}` — a fresh object every render, which is what most call-sites
write. The mirror effect depended on that object AND on the TanStack `table`
(also rebuilt each render), so it re-ran on every commit; since it calls back
into the parent's setState, that is an infinite loop.

Hold both in refs and depend only on `selection`, which changes exactly when
the user ticks a row — when antd would fire onChange.

Verified against the reference, which opens the same modal cleanly, so this
was a migration regression rather than pre-existing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants