Adds optional description to providers#210
Conversation
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## trunk #210 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 87.38% 87.41% +0.02%
- Complexity 1188 1189 +1
============================================
Files 60 60
Lines 3837 3846 +9
============================================
+ Hits 3353 3362 +9
Misses 484 484
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
felixarntz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! Though this prompts for a slight refactoring of ProviderMetadata constructor.
felixarntz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Almost good to go! Preemptively approving, but please address the remaining feedback before merge.
This adds "description" as an optional field for providers. This is useful in contexts where providers are being listed out for users.