The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Co-authored-by: vk17-starlord <vineet2003@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: Mamaduka <mamaduka@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: t-hamano <wildworks@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: carolinan <poena@git.wordpress.org>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@Mamaduka @fabiankaegy – I have created this PR to demonstrate how the "Back to Top" component can be integrated into our core blocks library. You can view the Loom video to see it in action and get a better understanding of its behavior and functionality.

I’d like to start a discussion around what improvements we can make to this component. The current code might not be fully optimized or formatted to match the standards of our other core blocks, but these aspects can be refined later.

My main focus is on the UX of this "Back to Top" component. What do you think could be improved? Also, what customization options should we offer to users?

As I remember, this has been tried before - #50600, but the PR was closed as not planned. IMO, niche blocks like these seem like plugin teritory.

I also think this block is in the plugin territory. User preferences for how this block works vary widely, and I think it may be difficult to abstract or generalize as a core block.

I think if there is a final decision, the issue should be closed too. I mean otherwise someone will pick it up again in a few months and they will spend all that time on it.

If you want to turn this into a plugin, please read about the impact on accessibility, in the earlier PR.

I think if there is a final decision, the issue should be closed too. I mean otherwise someone will pick it up again in a few months and they will spend all that time on it.

100%. I think both can be closed as "maybe later".

It would be great to finalize the core blocks proposal #58773.

If there is an intentional focus on "canonical plugins" between 6.8 and 7.0, then yes that proposal could be revisited.

Closing based on recent discussions. See: #50433 (comment).