You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Scaffolding tool and docs generate/describe the wrong eval scenario format #94
eval/scenarios/README.md is explicit: "All scenarios are JSON files only (no markdown counterparts)... Add new scenarios as <slug>.json." Every real file in eval/scenarios/ is .json. But three other places in the repo contradict this and would lead a contributor to produce the wrong format:
shared/scripts/scaffold-skill.mjs:60 — writes eval/scenarios/<skill-name>.md, a markdown file, not JSON.
docs/authoring-guide.md:52 — the "skill generation prompt template" tells an LLM to output "One scenario markdown file under eval/scenarios/".
CONTRIBUTING.md — describes eval scenarios as "simple markdown files" under "Add Evaluation Scenarios".
Why this matters
This is the exact tool/doc a new contributor is told to use (CONTRIBUTING.md → "Scaffold a new skill" → node shared/scripts/scaffold-skill.mjs). Following the documented path produces a scenario file in a format nothing else in the repo uses, that the harness doesn't expect, and that a reviewer will have to catch and ask to be redone by hand.
Reproduction
node shared/scripts/scaffold-skill.mjs test-skill "test description"
ls eval/scenarios/test-skill.md # exists — wrong format
ls eval/scenarios/*.json | grep test-skill # nothing — no JSON scenario was created
Activity