You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
*[Serverless architectures, five design patterns](https://thenewstack.io/serverless-architecture-five-design-patterns/)
97
+
98
+
99
+
### Serverless vendor lock-in?
100
+
There is some concern by organizations and developers about vendor lock-in
101
+
on serverless platforms. It is unclear if portability is worse for
102
+
serverless than other infrastructure-as-a-service pieces, but still worth
103
+
thinking about ahead of time. These resources provide additional
104
+
perspectives on lock-in and using multiple cloud providers.
105
+
106
+
*[On Serverless, Multi-Cloud, and Vendor Lock In](https://blog.symphonia.io/on-serverless-multi-cloud-and-vendor-lock-in-da930b3993f)
107
+
is an opinion piece that for *most* cases the additional work of
108
+
going multi-cloud is not worth the tradeoffs, therefore at this time
109
+
it's better to go for a single vendor such as AWS or Azure and optimize
110
+
on that platform.
111
+
112
+
*[Why vendor lock-in with serverless isn’t what you think it is](https://medium.com/@PaulDJohnston/why-vendor-lock-in-with-serverless-isnt-what-you-think-it-is-d6be40fa9ca9)
113
+
is a short piece that also recommends using a single vendor for
114
+
now and stop worrying about hedging your bets because it typically
115
+
makes your infrastructure significantly more complex.
116
+
117
+
*[The (Fixable) Problem with Serverless](https://www.iopipe.com/2016/06/the-fixable-problem-with-serverless/)
118
+
is a bit of a marketing piece but it introduces
119
+
[the IOPipe open source projects](https://github.com/iopipe)
120
+
that are designed as an abstraction layer for running on multiple
0 commit comments