Conversation
The MCP gateway comparison table carried a footnote naming three specific hosted products, which turned eight rows of judgement — shared account, partial, limited, hosted-only, proprietary — into public assertions about those companies rather than about an architecture. Two problems with that. It goes stale silently: any of them can ship per-user OAuth or change their licence tomorrow, and this page would then be wrong about a named company with nobody here noticing. And the "proprietary" cell was reading someone else's licence for them. The footnote now describes what makes the category the category — traffic leaves your network, upstream access is usually shared — and says outright that products differ and the reader should check the one they are actually evaluating. The licence cell says "varies by vendor". No row changed; the comparison is the same one, made against a design choice instead of a list of competitors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The MCP gateway comparison table's footnote named three specific hosted products. That turned eight rows of judgement — shared account, partial, limited, hosted-only, proprietary — into public assertions about those companies rather than about an architecture.
Two problems:
The footnote now describes what makes the category the category — traffic leaves your network, upstream access is usually shared — and says plainly that products differ and the reader should check the one they are evaluating. The licence cell reads "varies by vendor".
No row changed. It is the same comparison, made against a design choice instead of a list of competitors. Both languages.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code