Skip to content

Define sched_param.__reduce__ with #[pymethod] - #9551

Merged
youknowone merged 4 commits into
RustPython:mainfrom
youknowdot:fix-sched-param-main-20261102
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

youknowone merged 4 commits into
RustPython:mainfrom
youknowdot:fix-sched-param-main-20261102

Conversation

@youknowdot

@youknowdot youknowdot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Define posix.sched_param.__reduce__ with #[pymethod] instead of a hand-built PyMethodDef installed in #[extend_class]. It now reports __text_signature__ == '($self, /)' with __doc__ is None, matching CPython's METH_NOARGS method without a docstring. The return value is unchanged: (type, (sched_priority,)).
  • PyStructSequence::extend_class now installs the default __reduce__ unconditionally. Method definitions are installed after class extension, so an impl's own __reduce__ replaces the default; the contains check had no remaining users.

Not in scope

The class signature of sched_param still falls back to (iterable=(), /) (CPython: (sched_priority)). An earlier revision of this PR added a constructor_args option to #[pystruct_sequence] for it; that option was removed because sched_param would be its only user and the declared type was not tied to the type slot_new binds.

Validation

  • cargo fmt --check, cargo clippy -p rustpython-vm --all-targets (no new warnings).
  • On macOS: time.struct_time pickle round-trip and os.stat_result.__reduce__ signature/doc checked. sched_param is Linux-only; relying on CI for it.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 62 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing youknowdot:fix-sched-param-main-20261102 (255a440) with main (e2abc4c)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

youknowdot and others added 3 commits November 12, 2026 12:23
Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex:model version not exposed
Retain coverage of signature infrastructure while removing tests tied to individual Python callables, as requested.

Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex:model version not exposed
Replace the derive expansion token comparison tests with a vm test that
checks the class signature produced by constructor_args. Install the
default struct sequence __reduce__ unconditionally; an impl's own
__reduce__ method replaces it.

Assisted-by: Claude
@youknowone
youknowone force-pushed the fix-sched-param-main-20261102 branch from 43d2077 to 880ae1a Compare November 12, 2026 09:10
Remove the constructor_args pystruct_sequence option, the
PyStructSequence::CONSTRUCTOR_PARAMS constant, and their tests. The class
signature of struct sequences again falls back to (iterable=(), /);
sched_param keeps its #[pymethod] __reduce__.

Assisted-by: Claude
@youknowone youknowone changed the title Expose sched_param signatures from its existing bindings Define sched_param.__reduce__ with #[pymethod] Nov 12, 2026
@youknowone
youknowone marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2026 12:59
@youknowone
youknowone merged commit 8ababe1 into RustPython:main Nov 12, 2026
28 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-12T12:59:47.234226Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
255a440 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants