Skip to content

Conversation

@Piyush1045
Copy link

@Piyush1045 Piyush1045 commented Nov 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Applied minor formatting improvements to build configuration code for enhanced readability and consistency.
    • Reorganized error handling output and consolidated resource compilation statements within build processes.
    • All modifications maintain existing functionality; no changes to application behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Minor formatting changes applied to Windows resource handling in build.rs. The else branch that logs missing logo.ico is condensed to a single line, and the chained res.compile() call within map_err is reformatted to a single line. No functional or control flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Windows Resource Handling Formatting
build.rs
Reformatted else branch logging and chained res.compile() call onto single lines; no functional changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

O-windows

Suggested reviewers

  • youknowone

Poem

🐰 A coat of white space, so neat and so fine,
Compacted and trimmed on a single-line shrine,
No logic was changed, just the shape of the code,
Formatting brushed down the compiler's long road! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'test_auto_format 02' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't convey meaningful information about the actual changes (formatting updates to Windows resource handling in build.rs). Consider using a more descriptive title such as 'Clean up Windows resource handling formatting in build.rs' that reflects the actual changes made.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Code has been automatically formatted

The code in this PR has been formatted using cargo fmt.
The changes have been committed with [skip ci] to avoid triggering another CI run.

Triggered by commit: 42f6ae4832c4357f72bdf03e654ce69b84bcdbba
Last formatted: 2025-11-10T19:23:30Z

You may need to pull the latest changes before pushing again:

git pull origin test

@Piyush1045
Copy link
Author

@fanninpm this?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
build.rs (1)

10-13: Consider more idiomatic error handling pattern.

The map_err(|e| {...}).ok() pattern is unconventional for errors that are being logged but discarded. Consider more explicit alternatives such as let _ = res.compile().map_err(|e| println!(...)); or adding a comment explaining why the error is intentionally ignored.

Apply this diff for more idiomatic error handling:

-        res.compile().map_err(|e| {
-                println!("cargo:warning=Failed to compile Windows resources: {e}");
-            })
-            .ok();
+        let _ = res.compile().map_err(|e| {
+            println!("cargo:warning=Failed to compile Windows resources: {e}");
+        });

Alternatively, if the intent is to never fail the build despite resource compilation errors, add a comment clarifying this design decision.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d46172 and 42f6ae4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.rs: Format Rust code with the default rustfmt style (run cargo fmt)
Run clippy and fix any warnings or lints introduced by your changes
Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management

Files:

  • build.rs
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to Lib/test/**/*.py : When modifying CPython tests, add a '# TODO: RUSTPYTHON' comment documenting the reason
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Run clippy and fix any warnings or lints introduced by your changes
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Format Rust code with the default rustfmt style (run `cargo fmt`)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Run clippy and fix any warnings or lints introduced by your changes

Applied to files:

  • build.rs
📚 Learning: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-11T05:06:59.971Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management

Applied to files:

  • build.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: auto_format
🔇 Additional comments (2)
build.rs (2)

7-9: Formatting does not align with standard rustfmt style.

Line 7 combines the opening brace and println on the same line, but places return on the next line. This is inconsistent with standard Rust formatting conventions. Standard rustfmt would either place the entire block contents on separate lines or condense the entire construct.

Please run cargo fmt and verify the output matches the standard formatting style. As per coding guidelines, the code should follow the default rustfmt style.


1-15: I cannot execute cargo commands in this sandbox environment due to system limitations. Since the script failed to run, I need to request manual verification.

Manual verification required for clippy compliance

The shell script failed to execute due to sandbox environment constraints. Please run the following commands locally to verify the code meets all clippy requirements:

cargo fmt --check build.rs
cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings

Additionally, review the code pattern at lines 10-13 where map_err(...).ok() is used—this pattern converts the Result to an Option and discards it. Verify that no clippy lints are triggered by this error suppression approach.

@fanninpm
Copy link
Contributor

@fanninpm this?

I guess I was wrong.

@Piyush1045
Copy link
Author

but there will be some edge cases that i not aware of

@Piyush1045 Piyush1045 closed this Nov 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants