Skip to content

Conversation

@henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor

@henryjonathanquispe henryjonathanquispe commented Jan 24, 2025

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@tokensPM
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-e7e50ace85.engk8s.processmaker.net

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pmPaulis I updated the PR solving the conflicts

@tokensPM
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-e7e50ace85.engk8s.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit d490380 into epic/FOUR-20267 Jan 27, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants