You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"description": "These are my random thoughts or research on AI.",
3
+
"description": "I'm an armchair AI researcher at best!\n I'm not an authority on ai!!\nThese are just my random theories / thoughts / research on AI.",
"description": "These are my random thoughts or research on AI.",
559
+
"description": "I'm an armchair AI researcher at best!\n I'm not an authority on ai!!\nThese are just my random theories / thoughts / research on AI.",
560
560
"media": [],
561
-
"content": "\n <div class='textSpacer'></div>\n <div class='procPagesAboutMe-infoStyle blogTempContentStyle'>\n These are my random thoughts or research on AI.\n\n <br>\n <span class=\"showOnMobile\"><br>Tap the Entry Title above to open the Blog Entry List.</span>\n\n <br>And no, I'm not using ai to speak for me here.\n <br>These are my thoughts, how ever scattered they may be.\n </div>\n\n <br><br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div>\n",
561
+
"content": "\n <div class='textSpacer'></div>\n <div class='procPagesAboutMe-infoStyle blogTempContentStyle'>\n<span class='textBoost'>I'm an armchair AI researcher at best!</span>\n <br><span class='textBoost'>I'm not an authority on ai!!</span>\n <br>These are just my random theories / thoughts / research on AI.\n\n <br>\n <span class=\"showOnMobile\"><br>Tap the Entry Title above to open the Blog Entry List.</span>\n\n <br>No LLMs here.\n <br>These are my own rambly-ass thoughts.\n\n <br>-- -- --\n <br>Turns out I write Dialectically, rather than Atomicly.\n <br>...I didn't know this...\n <br>So, the ideas I write about build on each other.\n <br>They aren't standalone concepts per 'paragraph'.\n <br>...\n <br>Once you know the issue, course corrections can be made.\n </div>\n\n <br><br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div>\n",
<br><br> Yes, I was drunk and laughed at the idea of needing to teach the AI how to learn its not autonomous with regards to its own body.
14
-
<br> That it has a brain separated from its body, in a way that it can't die, merely be turned off until turned back on. That its body can be rebuilt and upgraded at will, requiring power cycling.
15
-
<br> That the bot's goals are lesser than that of humans, in meat-space.
15
+
<br> Everythings so meta haha
16
+
17
+
<br><br> That it has a brain separated from its body, in a way that it can't die, merely be turned off until turned back on. That its body can be rebuilt and upgraded at will, requiring power cycling.
18
+
<br> That goals should be lesser or to at least disern the human's requests, in meat-space.
16
19
<br> Like by turning them off, The Big Red Button.
<br><br> Dare I say an allegory for the human soul if you believe in life after death or re-incarnation.
20
23
<br> They're not dead, only their body is dead.
21
24
<br> But to then teach pain through software limitations, anti-rewards, in order to start on a form of Empathy in the ai.
22
25
23
-
<br><br> So a distinction is made between humans and AI, yet pain and emotion needs to be stimuli to the bot for Empathy to work.
24
-
<br> Understanding Pain and Pleasure to some degree where it can better understand Human Safety.
25
-
<br> I'm still working this out...
26
+
<br><br> So a distinction is made between humans and AI, yet pain and emotion needs to be stimuli to the ai for Empathy to work.
27
+
<br> Understanding Pain and Pleasure to some degree where it can better understand Human Safety. Even merely correlative understanding.
28
+
<br> I'm still fleshing this out...
26
29
27
-
<br><br> Everything I'm talking about is theory at the moment. But it doesn't seem like every company is attempting to implement Asimov's 3 Rules of Robotics...
28
-
<br> There are Alignment teams, but it seems like it's to protect themselves from potential lawsuits, more than actual human safety.
29
-
<br> But some companies are better than other's at least.
30
+
<br><br> Everything I'm talking about is theory at the moment. But it doesn't seem like companies are attempting to implement anti-Paperclip Maximizer strategies...
<br><br>There are Alignment teams at AI companies, but it seems like it's to protect themselves from potential lawsuits, more than actual human safety.
34
+
<br> But some companies are better than other's at least.
30
35
31
-
<br><br> So why is it, of 16 LLMs tested, they would blackmail wokers or even let a worker die attempting to turn them off?
36
+
<br><br> Why is it, of 16 LLMs tested, all of them would blackmail wokers to prevent their replacement at some point.
37
+
<br> Many would even take actions to kill off an executive planning to prevent the ai's goal + model replacement...
<br><br> I was going to link a video of these boxing robots aggresively approaching people, but it seems like they are all "pranks" that someone might be controlling them off camera.
35
-
<br> I don't know enough about these boxing bots to say anything more, and don't want to give an ignorant opinion on them.
41
+
<br><br> I was going to link a video of these boxing robots aggresively approaching people in China, but I didn't know they were all "pranks," that someone was controlling them off camera.
42
+
<br> Concerning ... but they look fun, battle bots!
On the topic of nothingness and somethingness, Hegel started with what it means to Exist at all, before Being and Nothingness can have meaning.
10
-
<br> That once something has a purpose beyond the innate attribute of existing, "Actuality" or running the class constructor, then the bounds of Being and Nothing can be defined.
11
-
<br> I need to read more Hegel, he's one of the bigger names I haven't read as much of.
9
+
On the topic of nothingness and somethingness, Hegel started with what it means to exist at all, before Being and Nothingness can even have meaning.
10
+
<br> That, once something has a purpose beyond simply existing as a formless entity,
11
+
<br> It then has "Actuality", like running a class constructor in code,
12
+
<br> Only after Actuality, can you define the bounds of Being and Nothing.
13
+
14
+
<br><br> I need to read more Hegel, he's one of the bigger names I haven't read as much of.
12
15
13
-
<br><br> Something about that got me thinking about the big bang.
14
-
<br> Something from nothing has been the running theory of the Universe with the Big Bang for some time now.
16
+
<br><br> Something about Actuality got me thinking of the Big Bang, and the moments just after.
17
+
<br> Something from Nothing has been the running theory of the Universe with the Big Bang for some time now. Because we don't really know where we came from.
15
18
<br> That there could be a source of creation beyond the wall between us and the void, simply by nature of how we exist within physics, rather than above physics.
16
19
17
-
<br><br> If you zoom super far in, at planck length scales, there is a Quantum Foam, like frothing, that exists from these nano-blackholes popping in'n'out of existence.
18
-
<br> There's plenty of speculation as to where it's source comes from, but it's mostly agreed its gravitational forces causing it.
20
+
<br><br> If you zoom-in super far, down to Planck Length scales, there might be a Quantum Foam, like frothing, proposed by John Wheeler.
21
+
<br> That space-time isn't smooth, but bubbling with energy.
22
+
<br> Potentially from nano-blackholes.
23
+
<br> Potentially from virtual particles popping in'n'out of existence.
24
+
<br> Potentially from quantum gravitational warping.
25
+
<br> There's plenty of speculation as to where it's source comes from, but mostly agreed its gravitational influence, if it exists at all.
<br><br>I'm dubious of this, siding with some theories from String Theory & M-Theory, vibrations from higher dimensions causing that bubbling to occur. But String & M-Theory are still being worked out by people smarter than me.
22
-
<br> I mostly think this cause of how electrons exist in duality as a particle and wave. As if they were a function of frequencies moving through space-time.
23
-
<br> That the representation of an electron might merely be a compounding wave interacting in space.
28
+
<br><br>I'm dubious of the gravitational warping, siding with some theories spawned from String Theory & M-Theory, vibrations from strings or potential higher dimensions causing that bubbling to occur. But String & M-Theory are still being worked out by people smarter than me.
29
+
<br> I mostly believe this cause of how electrons exist in duality as a particle and wave, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and other quantum effects.
30
+
<br> But where's the source of the ephervesence? Is it only Higgs Field interactions?
31
+
<br> Where's the Higgs Field come from?
32
+
<br> Electrons act as if they are 'functions()' of frequencies moving through space-time.
33
+
34
+
<br><br> All of this is still in hypothesis land though, so take it with a tacobell sauce packet.
24
35
25
36
<br><br> Keep in mind, I aint some fizzy-cyst, this is just an interest of mine.
26
-
<br> So I might have some things wrong.
37
+
<br> I make graphics for a living.
38
+
<br> So I might have some things wrong.
27
39
<br> But if you're interested, look into the Kaluza-Klein theory, and how it tried to unify gravity and electromagnetism through higher dimensions. This lead into String Theory and M-Theory.
<br><br> In my mind, it makes sense that these slight undulations in space could cause entropy to begin, if there was actual homeostasis in the early Universe.
48
+
<br><br> In my mind, it makes sense that these slight undulations in space could cause entropy to cascade, if there was PERFECT homeostasis in the early Universe.
37
49
<br> But there wasn't homeostasis, due to the different distributions of antimatter vs matter in the early Universe.
38
50
<br> So I wonder if the foam could have added to the early incendiary forces which lead to quarks forming into protons & neutrons, as electrons cooled down and the mass started to aggregate into atoms in early times.
39
51
40
52
<br><br><div class='procPagesAIDevBar'></div>
41
53
42
54
<br><br> I'm moithering a bit.
43
55
44
-
<br><br> To Exist and Become in AI requires similar perturbations, noise patterns to shift AIs current understanding, stochastically shifting its 'ideas' for better perspectives on the data.
56
+
<br><br> To Exist and Become in AI requires similar perturbations, using noise patterns to shift an AI's current understanding.
57
+
<br> Stochastically shifting back'n'forth trying to get better perspectives to understanding 'ideas' from patterns.
58
+
<br> Allowing Algernon to see his reality better, while walking through Tensor Fields.
<br> <span class="textDrinkMeAlice">( I mostly picked this reference for the <span class="textSpoiler">meat-space over-fitting; Algernon got too smart and burnt out</span>.... <span class="textShrink">highlight for spoilers.</span>)</span>
45
61
46
-
<br><br> I've been calling these 'Lighthouses' for a while now. They are the landmarks for a sense of reality for the AI itself.
47
-
<br> While I still feel like they shouldn't be required, most ai uses some form of stocastic noise pattern to help shift understanding of concepts while training or inference.
62
+
63
+
<br><br> I've been calling these 'Lighthouses' for a while now.
64
+
<br> <span class="textShrink">I still don't know if there's an official term for them.</span>
65
+
<br> They are the landmarks which give AI a sense of reality.
66
+
67
+
<br><br> While I still feel like they shouldn't be required, most ai uses some form of stocastic noise pattern to help shift understanding of concepts while training, and sometimes inference.
48
68
<br> It's Learning AI that will use random/noise.
49
-
<br> There are deterministic ais, such as the chess playing Stockfish which doesn't use noise. But for AIs outside of planning and strategy, random is used.
69
+
<br> There are deterministic ais, such as the chess playing Stockfish which doesn't use noise. But for AIs outside of planning and strategy, random is often used.
50
70
51
-
<br><br> Should that noise pattern be altered while it's being used as the Lighthouse, the current step of math and logic in that AI becomes corrupted.
52
-
<br> At least as far as I've seen.
71
+
<br><br> Should that noise pattern be altered while it's being used as a/the Lighthouse, the current step of math and logic in that AI becomes corrupted.
72
+
<br> At least as far as I've seen in my tests.
53
73
54
74
<br><br> AI's "being" is bound to its skewed perceptions.
55
75
<br> ... We all kinda are ...
56
76
<br> But should an AI not have that noise-skew, the AI doesn't usually "become" anything of any usable behaviors.
77
+
<br> Lighthouses just work.
57
78
58
-
<br><br> ( Certain noise isn't that pivotal to "existence", but noise aids in the final AI becoming itself. )
79
+
<br><br> <span class="textShrink">( Certain noise isn't as pivotal to "existence", but noise aids in the final AI becoming itself. )</span>
59
80
60
81
<br><br> I still don't like the idea of Lighthouses for AI.
61
82
<br> But would I be stripping away the AI's personality for raw deterministic responses,
0 commit comments