Skip to content

Conversation

@RDIL
Copy link
Contributor

@RDIL RDIL commented Jan 9, 2019

PR Summary

Since when was Travis-CI used?? I removed it and replaced it with Azure DevOps because that isn't there.

PR Checklist

@vexx32
Copy link
Collaborator

vexx32 commented Jan 9, 2019

Travis CI stopped being used maybe a couple months ago? It was used for MacOS and Linux agents before we switched to Azure. 😄

@RDIL
Copy link
Contributor Author

RDIL commented Jan 9, 2019

Haha it was a rhetorical question but okay, at least this PR removes it.

@RDIL
Copy link
Contributor Author

RDIL commented Jan 9, 2019

Not to be confused with @TravisEz13 @iSazonov

@RDIL RDIL changed the title Contributing guidelines: Remove Travis CI Contributing guidelines: Remove Travis CI and AppVeyor Jan 9, 2019
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 changed the title Contributing guidelines: Remove Travis CI and AppVeyor Contributing guidelines: Remove references Travis CI and AppVeyor Jan 9, 2019
@TravisEz13
Copy link
Member

I edited your description to clarify this . #8617 (comment)

We are supposed to give 24 hours for review. If I don't, merge this by EOD tomorrow, feel free to ping me.

@RDIL RDIL changed the title Contributing guidelines: Remove references Travis CI and AppVeyor Contributing guidelines: Remove references to Travis CI and AppVeyor Jan 9, 2019
@RDIL
Copy link
Contributor Author

RDIL commented Jan 9, 2019

👍

@RDIL
Copy link
Contributor Author

RDIL commented Jan 10, 2019

@TravisEz13 its been about a day now.

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 merged commit a3d5578 into PowerShell:master Jan 10, 2019
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 added the CL-Docs Indicates that a PR should be marked as a documentation change in the Change Log label Jan 10, 2019
@RDIL RDIL deleted the patch-3 branch January 10, 2019 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-Docs Indicates that a PR should be marked as a documentation change in the Change Log

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants