-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.1k
Fix breaking change in Add-Type #5306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
daxian-dbw
merged 1 commit into
PowerShell:master
from
iSazonov:fix-add-type-breaking-change
Nov 3, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't we want to use the updated StringBuilderCode here to get the perf benefit? Also there is duplicate code that could be handled with base class helper methods. But I believe you are looking to refactor this code so it may not be worth changing now just to be refactored later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the method is a candidate to remove. I've tried add [Obsolete] but it don't work. I think we could document the method and perhaps the class as deprecated - I'll wonder if anybody use it. Another argument for removing this code is that the code is the remainder of the CodeDom.
So I split the code (no helper methods) to easily remove the deprecated code later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the breaking changes to
AddTypeCommandBaseis most likely safe. I searched on Github and don't see the typeAddTypeCommandBasegets used except AddType.Given that, would it be OK that we just keep the breaking change made in #5243? Maybe you want to do further cleanup, such as completely remove the base type, in your subsequent work on Add-Type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see the need for
AddTypeCommandBase. If the team approves, I'll be happy to remove that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm merging this PR. We can loop in the powershell committee in your subsequent add-type refactoring PR (or the issue for that work).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The request is in #5158.