Skip to content

Conversation

@CarloToso
Copy link
Contributor

@CarloToso CarloToso commented Feb 6, 2023

PR Summary

  • Certificate store was opened but never closed -> using store
  • I think we don't need to use GetHttpClient(handleRedirect) twice, the client doesn't change
  • Formatting

PR Context

PR Checklist

currentUri = new Uri(request.RequestUri, response.Headers.Location);

// Continue to handle redirection
using (client = GetHttpClient(handleRedirect))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good step for #12764 (comment) You could continue...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will try to continue, can you give me a more detailed to-do list?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I laid out there already. The goal is to cache HttpClient/HttpClientHandler in WebSession. These HttpClient/HttpClientHandler cannot be changed after they start. So if a cmdlet is called with modified arguments when there is a WebSession, we have to recreate them. This makes me think that our first step is to move all initialization to BeginProcessing. If it's possible, we can then implement caching.

@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log label Feb 6, 2023
response = GetResponse(client, redirectRequest, handleRedirect);
}
using HttpRequestMessage redirectRequest = GetRequest(currentUri);
response = GetResponse(client, redirectRequest, handleRedirect);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: it would great to inspect how we dispose HttpResponseMessage

Copy link
Contributor Author

@CarloToso CarloToso Feb 7, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed that:

  • response = GetResponse(client, redirectRequest, handleRedirect); line 1275
  • return GetResponse(client, requestWithoutRange, handleRedirect); line 1309
    are doing the same thing, I think they should have similar formatting, which one is better?

To dispose of HttpResponseMessage we could add using on line 1422, and it might be enough

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov Feb 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand the question about formatting.

To dispose of HttpResponseMessage we could add using on line 1422

Yes. And I see two callsites return GetResponse - I guess we need to dispose previous response before return new one.

In follow PR please.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry, I meant they should have the same syntax (not formatting) . And I wanted to know which syntax was more clear. In the next PR

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov Feb 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still don't understand. Feel free to pull PR with your preference.

@iSazonov iSazonov closed this Feb 8, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov reopened this Feb 8, 2023
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 21 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +8 -13
Percentile : 8.4%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +8 -13

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@iSazonov iSazonov changed the title Small changes webcmdlets Small changes in Webcmdlets Feb 8, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov merged commit 462f825 into PowerShell:master Feb 8, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 14, 2023

🎉v7.4.0-preview.2 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants