Skip to content

Conversation

@CarloToso
Copy link
Contributor

@CarloToso CarloToso commented Jan 17, 2023

PR Summary

  • Fix comments
  • replace if else with switch

PR Context

PR Checklist

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarloToso Please change only SetRequestContent in the PR and move other changes in new PR.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be worth doing it all over PowerShell code. Not in the PR.

@CarloToso CarloToso force-pushed the WebCmdlets-rework-SetRequestContent branch from 4ecd75f to 816e57e Compare January 18, 2023 09:57
@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log label Jan 18, 2023
CarloToso and others added 3 commits January 18, 2023 12:46
…Cmdlet/Common/WebRequestPSCmdlet.Common.cs

Co-authored-by: Ilya <darpa@yandex.ru>
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 86 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Small
Size       : +41 -45
Percentile : 34.4%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +41 -45

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@ghost ghost added the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label Jan 26, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 26, 2023

This pull request has been automatically marked as Review Needed because it has been there has not been any activity for 7 days.
Maintainer, please provide feedback and/or mark it as Waiting on Author

@iSazonov iSazonov assigned iSazonov and unassigned adityapatwardhan Feb 1, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label Feb 1, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov changed the title WebCmdlets rework SetRequestContent Rework SetRequestContent in WebCmdlets Feb 1, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov merged commit c87f2a4 into PowerShell:master Feb 1, 2023
@CarloToso CarloToso deleted the WebCmdlets-rework-SetRequestContent branch February 1, 2023 17:10
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 14, 2023

🎉v7.4.0-preview.2 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants