Skip to content

Conversation

@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov commented Jan 3, 2023

PR Summary

Fix regression after #11884.

PR Context

PR Checklist

@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log label Jan 3, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov requested a review from SteveL-MSFT January 3, 2023 17:08
@iSazonov iSazonov requested a review from daxian-dbw as a code owner January 3, 2023 17:08
@iSazonov iSazonov self-assigned this Jan 3, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov requested a review from anmenaga as a code owner January 3, 2023 17:08
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 4 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +2 -2
Percentile : 1.6%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +2 -2

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Copy link
Member

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a test that could be added?

@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

iSazonov commented Jan 9, 2023

Is there a test that could be added?

I don't understand how the nulls could appear. Perhaps it is internals of the Windows API. Then there is no chance of creating a test. 😕
Perhaps it is a dead code since we have not seen problems for a long time.

@SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member

This code appears to only be used with the built in ReadLine and not when PSReadLine is used. I suspect it's to handle the case of cut & paste where the content includes nulls. Given that this code is likely not used often (as most folks are using the default PSReadLine), I wouldn't spend time adding a test then.

@iSazonov iSazonov merged commit 046c8d4 into PowerShell:master Jan 10, 2023
@iSazonov iSazonov deleted the input-contains branch January 10, 2023 02:38
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 14, 2023

🎉v7.4.0-preview.2 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-CodeCleanup Indicates that a PR should be marked as a Code Cleanup change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants