Skip to content

Conversation

@SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT commented Nov 3, 2022

PR Summary

The execv() API is documented to copy the env to the new process, but doesn't do that. Apparently it requires use of a global variable in C. Switch to execve() and manually copy the current env to the new process.

PR Context

Fix #18432

PR Checklist

@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator

iSazonov commented Nov 3, 2022

It seems bug in .Net. They cache env variables https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/9b9aeafbecbdae09dbcad7110d9d38ee04138d5b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Environment.Variables.Unix.cs#L38 but don't update environ if an env variable is changed.

GitHub
.NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps. - runtime/Environment.Variables.Unix.cs at 9b9aeafbecbdae09dbcad7110d9d38ee04138d5b · dotnet/runtime

Copy link
Collaborator

@JamesWTruher JamesWTruher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 16 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +13 -3
Percentile : 6.4%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +10 -3
.ps1 : +3 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw added the CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log label Nov 7, 2022
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw merged commit 0ddf89e into PowerShell:master Nov 7, 2022
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT deleted the switchprocess-env branch November 7, 2022 19:13
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw assigned daxian-dbw and unassigned anmenaga Nov 8, 2022
@TravisEz13
Copy link
Member

/backport to release/v7.3.1

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@TravisEz13 backporting to release/v7.3.1 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch

Applying: Fix `Switch-Process` to copy the current env to the new process
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/System.Management.Automation/engine/Modules/SwitchProcessCommand.cs
M	test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
Auto-merging src/System.Management.Automation/engine/Modules/SwitchProcessCommand.cs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/System.Management.Automation/engine/Modules/SwitchProcessCommand.cs
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Fix `Switch-Process` to copy the current env to the new process
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@TravisEz13
Copy link
Member

/backport to release/v7.3.1

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@TravisEz13 backporting to release/v7.3.1 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch

Applying: Fix `Switch-Process` to copy the current env to the new process
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/System.Management.Automation/engine/Modules/SwitchProcessCommand.cs
M	test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1
Auto-merging src/System.Management.Automation/engine/Modules/SwitchProcessCommand.cs
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Fix `Switch-Process` to copy the current env to the new process
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

TravisEz13 pushed a commit to TravisEz13/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2022
TravisEz13 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2022
…w process (#18632)

* Fix `Switch-Process` to copy the current env to the new process (#18452)

* Update test/powershell/Modules/Microsoft.PowerShell.Core/Exec.Tests.ps1

Co-authored-by: Steve Lee <slee@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Backport-7.3.x-Done CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch-Process (exec) fails to make the replacement process inherit the calling process' environment variables

6 participants