Examples (check box indicate correct predictions):

• Add Alpine 3.11 image PowerShell-Docker#355 (comment)
• (this was written like a bug) New-PSSession : This parameter set requires WSMan, and no supported WSMan client library was found. PowerShell-Docker#347 (comment)
• Terms documentation page PowerShell-Docker#344 (comment)
• (written like a bug, but is request for a new image) Windows 10 1909 has been released , the mcr.microsoft.com/powershell:1909 is not exists PowerShell-Docker#343 (comment)
• Provider based Windows Server version 1909 image PowerShell-Docker#341

The predictions are only as good as the user input. I think this is useful as a first level triage. cc @RDIL for his input.

So far, from what I have seen, I’m not very optimistic for results here in this repository. Since the bot has the entire GitHub as it’s data set, one single person rating a deduction incorrectly throws off the entire data set by a bit. I don’t think it’s worth it, and we should most likely stick with issue templates which now have support for adding labels based on which template you use. If there is a self host option for it, that would most likely work 100x better because it will only be collecting powershell data - but the current hosted one is a no from me. Of course, this is just my opinion, but I think it should be taken under consideration.

@RDIL have you used it only in the docker repo? or other places?

No, I have not used it in other repositories.

@RDIL I understand your concern, but I don't think we have enough data to determine if it's useful from the experiment in the docker repo. We would get that data much faster from the PowerShell repo.

If you want to give it a try, you can go ahead with it.

🎉v7.1.0-preview.1 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

• Release Notes