.. default-domain:: cpp.. cpp:namespace:: arrow::compute
Warning
Acero is experimental and a stable API is not yet guaranteed.
For many complex computations, successive direct :ref:`invocation of compute functions <invoking-compute-functions>` is not feasible in either memory or computation time. Doing so causes all intermediate data to be fully materialized. To facilitate arbitrarily large inputs and more efficient resource usage, the Arrow C++ implementation also provides Acero, a streaming query engine with which computations can be formulated and executed.
Acero allows computation to be expressed as an "execution plan" (:class:`ExecPlan`) which is a directed graph of operators. Each operator (:class:`ExecNode`) provides, transforms, or consumes the data passing through it. Batches of data (:struct:`ExecBatch`) flow along edges of the graph from node to node. Structuring the API around streams of batches allows the working set for each node to be tuned for optimal performance independent of any other nodes in the graph. Each :class:`ExecNode` processes batches as they are pushed to it along an edge of the graph by upstream nodes (its inputs), and pushes batches along an edge of the graph to downstream nodes (its outputs) as they are finalized.
.. seealso::
`SHAIKHHA, A., DASHTI, M., & KOCH, C.
(2018). Push versus pull-based loop fusion in query engines.
Journal of Functional Programming, 28.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956796818000102>`_
In order to use Acero you will need to create an execution plan. This is the model that describes the computation you want to apply to your data. Acero has its own internal representation for execution plans but most users should not interact with this directly as it will couple their code to Acero.
Substrait is an open standard for execution plans. Acero implements the Substrait "consumer" interface. This means that Acero can accept a Substrait plan and fulfill the plan, loading the requested data and applying the desired computation. By using Substrait plans users can easily switch out to a different execution engine at a later time.
Substrait defines a broad set of operators and functions for many different situations and it is unlikely that Acero will ever completely satisfy all defined Substrait operators and functions. To help understand what features are available the following sections define which features have been currently implemented in Acero and any caveats that apply.
- A plan should have a single top-level relation.
- The consumer is currently based on version 0.20.0 of Substrait. Any features added that are newer will not be supported.
- Due to a breaking change in 0.20.0 any Substrait plan older than 0.20.0 will be rejected.
- If a plan contains any extension type variations it will be rejected.
- Advanced extensions can be provided by supplying a custom implementation of :class:`arrow::engine::ExtensionProvider`.
- Any relation not explicitly listed below will not be supported and will cause the plan to be rejected.
- The
projectionproperty is not supported and plans containing this property will be rejected.- The
VirtualTableand ``ExtensionTable``read types are not supported. Plans containing these types will be rejected.- Only the parquet and arrow file formats are currently supported.
- All URIs must use the
fileschemepartition_index,start, andlengthare not supported. Plans containing non-default values for these properties will be rejected.- The Substrait spec requires that a
filterbe completely satisfied by a read relation. However, Acero only uses a read filter for pushdown projection and it may not be fully satisfied. Users should generally attach an additional filter relation with the same filter expression after the read relation.
- No known caveats
- No known caveats
- The join type
JOIN_TYPE_SINGLEis not supported and plans containing this will be rejected.- The join expression must be a call to either the
equaloris_not_distinct_fromfunctions. Both arguments to the call must be direct references. Only a single join key is supported.- The
post_join_filterproperty is not supported and will be ignored.
- At most one grouping set is supported.
- Each grouping expression must be a direct reference.
- Each measure's arguments must be direct references.
- A measure may not have a filter
- A measure may not have sorts
- A measure's invocation must be AGGREGATION_INVOCATION_ALL or AGGREGATION_INVOCATION_UNSPECIFIED
- A measure's phase must be AGGREGATION_PHASE_INITIAL_TO_RESULT
- Various places in the Substrait spec allow for expressions to be used outside of a filter or project relation. For example, a join expression or an aggregate grouping set. Acero typically expects these expressions to be direct references. Planners should extract the implicit projection into a formal project relation before delivering the plan to Acero.
- A literal with non-default nullability will cause a plan to be rejected.
- Acero does not have full support for non-nullable types and may allow input to have nulls without rejecting it.
- The table below shows the mapping between Arrow types and Substrait type classes that are currently supported
| Substrait Type | Arrow Type | Caveat |
|---|---|---|
| boolean | boolean | |
| i8 | int8 | |
| i16 | int16 | |
| i32 | int32 | |
| i64 | int64 | |
| fp32 | float32 | |
| fp64 | float64 | |
| string | string | |
| binary | binary | |
| timestamp | timestamp<MICRO,""> | |
| timestamp_tz | timestamp<MICRO,"UTC"> | |
| date | date32<DAY> | |
| time | time64<MICRO> | |
| interval_year | Not currently supported | |
| interval_day | Not currently supported | |
| uuid | Not currently supported | |
| FIXEDCHAR<L> | Not currently supported | |
| VARCHAR<L> | Not currently supported | |
| FIXEDBINARY<L> | fixed_size_binary<L> | |
| DECIMAL<P,S> | decimal128<P,S> | |
| STRUCT<T1...TN> | struct<T1...TN> | Arrow struct fields will have no name (empty string) |
| NSTRUCT<N:T1...N:Tn> | Not currently supported | |
| LIST<T> | list<T> | |
| MAP<K,V> | map<K,V> | K must not be nullable |
The following functions have caveats or are not supported at all. Note that this is not a comprehensive list. Functions are being added to Substrait at a rapid pace and new functions may be missing.
- Acero does not support the SATURATE option for overflow
- Acero does not support kernels that take more than two arguments for the functions
and,or,xor- Acero does not support temporal arithmetic
- Acero does not support the following standard functions:
is_not_distinct_fromlikesubstringstarts_withends_withcontainscountcount_distinctapprox_count_distinctThe functions above should be referenced using the URI
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/format/substrait/extension_types.yaml
- Alternatively, the URI can be left completely empty and Acero will match based only on function name. This fallback mechanism is non-standard and should be avoided if possible.
- :class:`ExecNode`
- Each node in the graph is an implementation of the :class:`ExecNode` interface.
- :class:`ExecPlan`
- A set of :class:`ExecNode` is contained and (to an extent) coordinated by an :class:`ExecPlan`.
- :class:`ExecFactoryRegistry`
- Instances of :class:`ExecNode` are constructed by factory functions held in a :class:`ExecFactoryRegistry`.
- :class:`ExecNodeOptions`
- Heterogenous parameters for factories of :class:`ExecNode` are bundled in an :class:`ExecNodeOptions`.
- :struct:`Declaration`
dplyr-inspired helper for efficient construction of an :class:`ExecPlan`.- :struct:`ExecBatch`
- A lightweight container for a single chunk of data in the Arrow format. In contrast to :class:`RecordBatch`, :struct:`ExecBatch` is intended for use exclusively in a streaming execution context (for example, it doesn't have a corresponding Python binding). Furthermore columns which happen to have a constant value may be represented by a :class:`Scalar` instead of an :class:`Array`. In addition, :struct:`ExecBatch` may carry execution-relevant properties including a guaranteed-true-filter for :class:`Expression` simplification.
An example :class:`ExecNode` implementation which simply passes all input batches through unchanged:
class PassthruNode : public ExecNode {
public:
// InputReceived is the main entry point for ExecNodes. It is invoked
// by an input of this node to push a batch here for processing.
void InputReceived(ExecNode* input, ExecBatch batch) override {
// Since this is a passthru node we simply push the batch to our
// only output here.
outputs_[0]->InputReceived(this, batch);
}
// ErrorReceived is called by an input of this node to report an error.
// ExecNodes should always forward errors to their outputs unless they
// are able to fully handle the error (this is rare).
void ErrorReceived(ExecNode* input, Status error) override {
outputs_[0]->ErrorReceived(this, error);
}
// InputFinished is used to signal how many batches will ultimately arrive.
// It may be called with any ordering relative to InputReceived/ErrorReceived.
void InputFinished(ExecNode* input, int total_batches) override {
outputs_[0]->InputFinished(this, total_batches);
}
// ExecNodes may request that their inputs throttle production of batches
// until they are ready for more, or stop production if no further batches
// are required. These signals should typically be forwarded to the inputs
// of the ExecNode.
void ResumeProducing(ExecNode* output) override { inputs_[0]->ResumeProducing(this); }
void PauseProducing(ExecNode* output) override { inputs_[0]->PauseProducing(this); }
void StopProducing(ExecNode* output) override { inputs_[0]->StopProducing(this); }
// An ExecNode has a single output schema to which all its batches conform.
using ExecNode::output_schema;
// ExecNodes carry basic introspection for debugging purposes
const char* kind_name() const override { return "PassthruNode"; }
using ExecNode::label;
using ExecNode::SetLabel;
using ExecNode::ToString;
// An ExecNode holds references to its inputs and outputs, so it is possible
// to walk the graph of execution if necessary.
using ExecNode::inputs;
using ExecNode::outputs;
// StartProducing() and StopProducing() are invoked by an ExecPlan to
// coordinate the graph-wide execution state. These do not need to be
// forwarded to inputs or outputs.
Status StartProducing() override { return Status::OK(); }
void StopProducing() override {}
Future<> finished() override { return inputs_[0]->finished(); }
};Note that each method which is associated with an edge of the graph must be invoked
with an ExecNode* to identify the node which invoked it. For example, in an
:class:`ExecNode` which implements JOIN this tagging might be used to differentiate
between batches from the left or right inputs.
InputReceived, ErrorReceived, InputFinished may only be invoked by
the inputs of a node, while ResumeProducing, PauseProducing, StopProducing
may only be invoked by outputs of a node.
:class:`ExecPlan` contains the associated instances of :class:`ExecNode` and is used to start and stop execution of all nodes and for querying/awaiting their completion:
// construct an ExecPlan first to hold your nodes
ARROW_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(auto plan, ExecPlan::Make(default_exec_context()));
// ... add nodes to your ExecPlan
// start all nodes in the graph
ARROW_RETURN_NOT_OK(plan->StartProducing());
SetUserCancellationCallback([plan] {
// stop all nodes in the graph
plan->StopProducing();
});
// Complete will be marked finished when all nodes have run to completion
// or acknowledged a StopProducing() signal. The ExecPlan should be kept
// alive until this future is marked finished.
Future<> complete = plan->finished();Warning
The following will be superceded by construction from Compute IR, see ARROW-14074.
None of the concrete implementations of :class:`ExecNode` are exposed in headers, so they can't be constructed directly outside the translation unit where they are defined. Instead, factories to create them are provided in an extensible registry. This structure provides a number of benefits:
- This enforces consistent construction.
- It decouples implementations from consumers of the interface (for example: we have two classes for scalar and grouped aggregate, we can choose which to construct within the single factory by checking whether grouping keys are provided)
- This expedites integration with out-of-library extensions. For example
"scan" nodes are implemented in the separate
libarrow_dataset.solibrary. - Since the class is not referencable outside the translation unit in which it is defined, compilers can optimize more aggressively.
Factories of :class:`ExecNode` can be retrieved by name from the registry. The default registry is available through :func:`arrow::compute::default_exec_factory_registry()` and can be queried for the built-in factories:
// get the factory for "filter" nodes:
ARROW_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(auto make_filter,
default_exec_factory_registry()->GetFactory("filter"));
// factories take three arguments:
ARROW_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(ExecNode* filter_node, *make_filter(
// the ExecPlan which should own this node
plan.get(),
// nodes which will send batches to this node (inputs)
{scan_node},
// parameters unique to "filter" nodes
FilterNodeOptions{filter_expression}));
// alternative shorthand:
ARROW_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(filter_node, MakeExecNode("filter",
plan.get(), {scan_node}, FilterNodeOptions{filter_expression});Factories can also be added to the default registry as long as they are
convertible to std::function<Result<ExecNode*>(
ExecPlan*, std::vector<ExecNode*>, const ExecNodeOptions&)>.
To build an :class:`ExecPlan` representing a simple pipeline which reads from a :class:`RecordBatchReader` then filters, projects, and writes to disk:
std::shared_ptr<RecordBatchReader> reader = GetStreamOfBatches();
ExecNode* source_node = *MakeExecNode("source", plan.get(), {},
SourceNodeOptions::FromReader(
reader,
GetCpuThreadPool()));
ExecNode* filter_node = *MakeExecNode("filter", plan.get(), {source_node},
FilterNodeOptions{
greater(field_ref("score"), literal(3))
});
ExecNode* project_node = *MakeExecNode("project", plan.get(), {filter_node},
ProjectNodeOptions{
{add(field_ref("score"), literal(1))},
{"score + 1"}
});
arrow::dataset::internal::Initialize();
MakeExecNode("write", plan.get(), {project_node},
WriteNodeOptions{/*base_dir=*/"/dat", /*...*/});:struct:`Declaration` is a dplyr-inspired helper which further decreases the boilerplate associated with populating an :class:`ExecPlan` from C++:
arrow::dataset::internal::Initialize();
std::shared_ptr<RecordBatchReader> reader = GetStreamOfBatches();
ASSERT_OK(Declaration::Sequence(
{
{"source", SourceNodeOptions::FromReader(
reader,
GetCpuThreadPool())},
{"filter", FilterNodeOptions{
greater(field_ref("score"), literal(3))}},
{"project", ProjectNodeOptions{
{add(field_ref("score"), literal(1))},
{"score + 1"}}},
{"write", WriteNodeOptions{/*base_dir=*/"/dat", /*...*/}},
})
.AddToPlan(plan.get()));Note that a source node can wrap anything which resembles a stream of batches. For example, PR#11032 adds support for use of a DuckDB query as a source node. Similarly, a sink node can wrap anything which absorbs a stream of batches. In the example above we're writing completed batches to disk. However we can also collect these in memory into a :class:`Table` or forward them to a :class:`RecordBatchReader` as an out-of-graph stream. This flexibility allows an :class:`ExecPlan` to be used as streaming middleware between any endpoints which support Arrow formatted batches.
An :class:`arrow::dataset::Dataset` can also be wrapped as a source node which
pushes all the dataset's batches into an :class:`ExecPlan`. This factory is added
to the default registry with the name "scan" by calling
arrow::dataset::internal::Initialize():
arrow::dataset::internal::Initialize();
std::shared_ptr<Dataset> dataset = GetDataset();
ASSERT_OK(Declaration::Sequence(
{
{"scan", ScanNodeOptions{dataset,
/* push down predicate, projection, ... */}},
{"filter", FilterNodeOptions{/* ... */}},
// ...
})
.AddToPlan(plan.get()));Datasets may be scanned multiple times; just make multiple scan nodes from that dataset. (Useful for a self-join, for example.) Note that producing two scan nodes like this will perform all reads and decodes twice.
:class:`ExecNode` is the component we use as a building block containing in-built operations with various functionalities.
This is the list of operations associated with the execution plan:
| Operation | Options |
|---|---|
source |
:class:`arrow::compute::SourceNodeOptions` |
table_source |
:class:`arrow::compute::TableSourceNodeOptions` |
filter |
:class:`arrow::compute::FilterNodeOptions` |
project |
:class:`arrow::compute::ProjectNodeOptions` |
aggregate |
:class:`arrow::compute::AggregateNodeOptions` |
sink |
:class:`arrow::compute::SinkNodeOptions` |
consuming_sink |
:class:`arrow::compute::ConsumingSinkNodeOptions` |
order_by_sink |
:class:`arrow::compute::OrderBySinkNodeOptions` |
select_k_sink |
:class:`arrow::compute::SelectKSinkNodeOptions` |
scan |
:class:`arrow::dataset::ScanNodeOptions` |
hash_join |
:class:`arrow::compute::HashJoinNodeOptions` |
write |
:class:`arrow::dataset::WriteNodeOptions` |
union |
N/A |
table_sink |
:class:`arrow::compute::TableSinkNodeOptions` |
A source operation can be considered as an entry point to create a streaming execution plan.
:class:`arrow::compute::SourceNodeOptions` are used to create the source operation. The
source operation is the most generic and flexible type of source currently available but it can
be quite tricky to configure. To process data from files the scan operation is likely a simpler choice.
The source node requires some kind of function that can be called to poll for more data. This
function should take no arguments and should return an
arrow::Future<std::optional<arrow::ExecBatch>>.
This function might be reading a file, iterating through an in memory structure, or receiving data
from a network connection. The arrow library refers to these functions as arrow::AsyncGenerator
and there are a number of utilities for working with these functions. For this example we use
a vector of record batches that we've already stored in memory.
In addition, the schema of the data must be known up front. Acero must know the schema of the data
at each stage of the execution graph before any processing has begun. This means we must supply the
schema for a source node separately from the data itself.
Here we define a struct to hold the data generator definition. This includes in-memory batches, schema and a function that serves as a data generator :
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: BatchesWithSchema Definition)
:end-before: (Doc section: BatchesWithSchema Definition)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
Generating sample batches for computation:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: MakeBasicBatches Definition)
:end-before: (Doc section: MakeBasicBatches Definition)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
Example of using source (usage of sink is explained in detail in :ref:`sink<stream_execution_sink_docs>`):
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Source Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Source Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
In the previous example, :ref:`source node <stream_execution_source_docs>`, a source node
was used to input the data. But when developing an application, if the data is already in memory
as a table, it is much easier, and more performant to use :class:`arrow::compute::TableSourceNodeOptions`.
Here the input data can be passed as a std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table> along with a max_batch_size.
The max_batch_size is to break up large record batches so that they can be processed in parallel.
It is important to note that the table batches will not get merged to form larger batches when the source
table has a smaller batch size.
Example of using table_source
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Table Source Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Table Source Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
filter operation, as the name suggests, provides an option to define data filtering
criteria. It selects rows matching a given expression. Filters can be written using
:class:`arrow::compute::Expression`. For example, if we wish to keep rows where the value
of column b is greater than 3, then we can use the following expression.
Filter example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Filter Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Filter Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
project operation rearranges, deletes, transforms, and creates columns.
Each output column is computed by evaluating an expression
against the source record batch. This is exposed via
:class:`arrow::compute::ProjectNodeOptions` which requires,
an :class:`arrow::compute::Expression` and name for each of the output columns (if names are not
provided, the string representations of exprs will be used).
Project example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Project Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Project Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
The aggregate node computes various types of aggregates over data.
Arrow supports two types of aggregates: "scalar" aggregates, and
"hash" aggregates. Scalar aggregates reduce an array or scalar input
to a single scalar output (e.g. computing the mean of a column). Hash
aggregates act like GROUP BY in SQL and first partition data based
on one or more key columns, then reduce the data in each
partition. The aggregate node supports both types of computation,
and can compute any number of aggregations at once.
:class:`arrow::compute::AggregateNodeOptions` is used to define the aggregation criteria. It takes a list of aggregation functions and their options; a list of target fields to aggregate, one per function; and a list of names for the output fields, one per function. Optionally, it takes a list of columns that are used to partition the data, in the case of a hash aggregation. The aggregation functions can be selected from :ref:`this list of aggregation functions <aggregation-option-list>`.
Note
This node is a "pipeline breaker" and will fully materialize the dataset in memory. In the future, spillover mechanisms will be added which should alleviate this constraint.
The aggregation can provide results as a group or scalar. For instances, an operation like hash_count provides the counts per each unique record as a grouped result while an operation like sum provides a single record.
Scalar Aggregation example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Scalar Aggregate Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Scalar Aggregate Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
Group Aggregation example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Group Aggregate Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Group Aggregate Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
sink operation provides output and is the final node of a streaming
execution definition. :class:`arrow::compute::SinkNodeOptions` interface is used to pass
the required options. Similar to the source operator the sink operator exposes the output
with a function that returns a record batch future each time it is called. It is expected the
caller will repeatedly call this function until the generator function is exhausted (returns
std::optional::nullopt). If this function is not called often enough then record batches
will accumulate in memory. An execution plan should only have one
"terminal" node (one sink node). An :class:`ExecPlan` can terminate early due to cancellation or
an error, before the output is fully consumed. However, the plan can be safely destroyed independently
of the sink, which will hold the unconsumed batches by exec_plan->finished().
As a part of the Source Example, the Sink operation is also included;
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Source Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Source Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
consuming_sink operator is a sink operation containing consuming operation within the
execution plan (i.e. the exec plan should not complete until the consumption has completed).
Unlike the sink node this node takes in a callback function that is expected to consume the
batch. Once this callback has finished the execution plan will no longer hold any reference to
the batch.
The consuming function may be called before a previous invocation has completed. If the consuming
function does not run quickly enough then many concurrent executions could pile up, blocking the
CPU thread pool. The execution plan will not be marked finished until all consuming function callbacks
have been completed.
Once all batches have been delivered the execution plan will wait for the finish future to complete
before marking the execution plan finished. This allows for workflows where the consumption function
converts batches into async tasks (this is currently done internally for the dataset write node).
Example:
// define a Custom SinkNodeConsumer
std::atomic<uint32_t> batches_seen{0};
arrow::Future<> finish = arrow::Future<>::Make();
struct CustomSinkNodeConsumer : public cp::SinkNodeConsumer {
CustomSinkNodeConsumer(std::atomic<uint32_t> *batches_seen, arrow::Future<>finish):
batches_seen(batches_seen), finish(std::move(finish)) {}
// Consumption logic can be written here
arrow::Status Consume(cp::ExecBatch batch) override {
// data can be consumed in the expected way
// transfer to another system or just do some work
// and write to disk
(*batches_seen)++;
return arrow::Status::OK();
}
arrow::Future<> Finish() override { return finish; }
std::atomic<uint32_t> *batches_seen;
arrow::Future<> finish;
};
std::shared_ptr<CustomSinkNodeConsumer> consumer =
std::make_shared<CustomSinkNodeConsumer>(&batches_seen, finish);
arrow::compute::ExecNode *consuming_sink;
ARROW_ASSIGN_OR_RAISE(consuming_sink, MakeExecNode("consuming_sink", plan.get(),
{source}, cp::ConsumingSinkNodeOptions(consumer)));Consuming-Sink example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: ConsumingSink Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: ConsumingSink Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
order_by_sink operation is an extension to the sink operation.
This operation provides the ability to guarantee the ordering of the
stream by providing the :class:`arrow::compute::OrderBySinkNodeOptions`.
Here the :class:`arrow::compute::SortOptions` are provided to define which columns
are used for sorting and whether to sort by ascending or descending values.
Note
This node is a "pipeline breaker" and will fully materialize the dataset in memory. In the future, spillover mechanisms will be added which should alleviate this constraint.
Order-By-Sink example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: OrderBySink Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: OrderBySink Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
select_k_sink option enables selecting the top/bottom K elements,
similar to a SQL ORDER BY ... LIMIT K clause.
:class:`arrow::compute::SelectKOptions` which is a defined by
using :struct:`OrderBySinkNode` definition. This option returns a sink node that receives
inputs and then compute top_k/bottom_k.
Note
This node is a "pipeline breaker" and will fully materialize the input in memory. In the future, spillover mechanisms will be added which should alleviate this constraint.
SelectK example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: KSelect Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: KSelect Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
The table_sink node provides the ability to receive the output as an in-memory table.
This is simpler to use than the other sink nodes provided by the streaming execution engine
but it only makes sense when the output fits comfortably in memory.
The node is created using :class:`arrow::compute::TableSinkNodeOptions`.
Example of using table_sink
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Table Sink Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Table Sink Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
scan is an operation used to load and process datasets. It should be preferred over the
more generic source node when your input is a dataset. The behavior is defined using
:class:`arrow::dataset::ScanNodeOptions`. More information on datasets and the various
scan options can be found in :doc:`./dataset`.
This node is capable of applying pushdown filters to the file readers which reduce the amount of data that needs to be read. This means you may supply the same filter expression to the scan node that you also supply to the FilterNode because the filtering is done in two different places.
Scan example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Scan Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Scan Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
The write node saves query results as a dataset of files in a
format like Parquet, Feather, CSV, etc. using the :doc:`./dataset`
functionality in Arrow. The write options are provided via the
:class:`arrow::dataset::WriteNodeOptions` which in turn contains
:class:`arrow::dataset::FileSystemDatasetWriteOptions`.
:class:`arrow::dataset::FileSystemDatasetWriteOptions` provides
control over the written dataset, including options like the output
directory, file naming scheme, and so on.
Write example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Write Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Write Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
union merges multiple data streams with the same schema into one, similar to
a SQL UNION ALL clause.
The following example demonstrates how this can be achieved using two data sources.
Union example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Union Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Union Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
hash_join operation provides the relational algebra operation, join using hash-based
algorithm. :class:`arrow::compute::HashJoinNodeOptions` contains the options required in
defining a join. The hash_join supports
left/right/full semi/anti/outerjoins.
Also the join-key (i.e. the column(s) to join on), and suffixes (i.e a suffix term like "_x"
which can be appended as a suffix for column names duplicated in both left and right
relations.) can be set via the the join options.
Read more on hash-joins.
Hash-Join example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: HashJoin Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: HashJoin Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match:
There are examples of these nodes which can be found in
cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc in the Arrow source.
Complete Example:
.. literalinclude:: ../../../cpp/examples/arrow/execution_plan_documentation_examples.cc
:language: cpp
:start-after: (Doc section: Execution Plan Documentation Example)
:end-before: (Doc section: Execution Plan Documentation Example)
:linenos:
:lineno-match: