Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28e9bf6 and 284d2f0.

• tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt (1 hunks)

• GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check

tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt (2)

419-419: Format and content look good.

Line 419 follows the established format and adds a waiver for a unique test (no duplicates detected). Bug reference is properly formatted.

---

417-418: Let me search for the exact valid moe_backend parameter values in TensorRT-LLM:

Duplicate waiver entries with conflicting bug IDs (confirmed); CUTEDSL parameter requires verification.

Lines 417–418 duplicate existing waivers from lines 346–347 for the same tests (test_auto_dtype[False-2] and test_auto_dtype[False-4]), but reference different bug IDs (5680312 vs 5636912). This creates conflicting waiver entries for identical test cases.

Additionally, lines 420–421 use moe_backend=CUTEDSL as a parameter. Web searches show valid MoE backends are CUTLASS and TRTLLM. The parameter value "CUTEDSL" does not appear in official TensorRT-LLM documentation, though CuTe DSL exists as a separate framework component, not a backend selection parameter.

For the duplicate entries (lines 346–347 vs 417–418): Clarify whether the older entries (bug 5636912) should be removed, or if these represent separate failure instances requiring distinct tracking.

For the CUTEDSL parameter (lines 420–421): Verify if this is the intended parameter value or a typo.

⛔ Skipped due to learnings

Learnt from: tongyuantongyu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7781
File: tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt:313-313
Timestamp: 2025-09-17T02:48:52.732Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, `tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt` is specifically for waiving/skipping tests, while other test list files like those in `test-db/` and `qa/` directories are for different test execution contexts (pre-merge, post-merge, QA tests). The same test appearing in both waives.txt and execution list files is intentional - the test is part of test suites but will be skipped due to the waiver.

Learnt from: djns99
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6915
File: cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/cutlass_kernels/moe_gemm/moe_kernels.cu:4010-4012
Timestamp: 2025-08-14T23:23:27.449Z
Learning: For MOE (Mixture of Experts) code reviews in TensorRT-LLM, avoid repeatedly suggesting finalize fusion validation checks and safety assertions. The user djns99 has indicated these suggestions are repetitive and unwanted across multiple MOE-related changes.

Learnt from: fredricz-20070104
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7645
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt:648-648
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test lists, it's common and intentional for the same test to appear in multiple test list files when they serve different purposes (e.g., llm_function_core.txt for comprehensive core functionality testing and llm_function_core_sanity.txt for quick sanity checks). This duplication allows tests to be run in different testing contexts.

Learnt from: yiqingy0
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 5198
File: jenkins/mergeWaiveList.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T08:33:49.109Z
Learning: In the TensorRT-LLM waive list merging system, removed lines are always located at the end of the merge waive lists, which is why the mergeWaiveList.py script uses reverse traversal - it's an optimization for this specific domain constraint.

Learnt from: EmmaQiaoCh
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 7370
File: tests/unittest/trt/model_api/test_model_quantization.py:24-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:07:45.863Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM's CI infrastructure, pytest skip markers (pytest.mark.skip) are properly honored even when test files have __main__ blocks that call test functions directly. The testing system correctly skips tests without requiring modifications to the __main__ block execution pattern.

Learnt from: moraxu
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6303
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/examples_test_list.txt:494-494
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM testing, it's common to have both CLI flow tests (test_cli_flow.py) and PyTorch API tests (test_llm_api_pytorch.py) for the same model. These serve different purposes: CLI flow tests validate the traditional command-line workflow, while PyTorch API tests validate the newer LLM API backend. Both are legitimate and should coexist.

Learnt from: Fridah-nv
Repo: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM PR: 6760
File: tensorrt_llm/_torch/auto_deploy/models/quant_config_reader.py:81-98
Timestamp: 2025-08-09T02:04:49.623Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM's auto_deploy module, torch.dtype values in configuration dictionaries must be stored as string representations (e.g., "float16" instead of torch.float16) because OmegaConf.merge does not support torch.dtype types. These string representations are converted to actual torch.dtype objects in downstream code.