Skip to content

Conversation

@venkywonka
Copy link
Collaborator

@venkywonka venkywonka commented Aug 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Make sure examples/ is reorganized to top, so the last-match-wins rule is used to match more specific example/* mappings to appropriate codeownership.
    • Currently before this PR, changes to examples/disaggregated will never get assigned to @NVIDIA/trt-llm-disagg-devs , etc. This fixes that.
    • It also makes doc-owners co-own the specific examples/** mappings.

Description

Test Coverage

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

Details

run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id (OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.

--disable-reuse-test (OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--test-backend "pytorch, cpp" (OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".

--detailed-log (OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.

--debug (OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in the stage-list parameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md
and the scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.py helper.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

Signed-off-by: Venky Ganesh <23023424+venkywonka@users.noreply.github.com>
@venkywonka venkywonka self-assigned this Aug 8, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .github/CODEOWNERS file was reorganized for improved clarity and maintainability by consolidating, grouping, and deduplicating code ownership rules. No ownership assignments or paths were changed, and no source code or exported entities were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CODEOWNERS Reorganization
.github/CODEOWNERS
Consolidated and grouped code ownership rules, removed redundant entries, and clarified section headings for easier maintenance. No changes to ownership assignments or paths.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • litaotju
  • atrifex
  • chzblych
  • juney-nvidia

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 915eda4 and 6f6a429.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@venkywonka venkywonka marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 19:40
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title [TRTLLM-7025] @coderabbitai title [TRTLLM-7025] [infra] Reorganize CODEOWNERS file for clarity and maintainability Aug 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS (2)

14-15: Nit: “GitHub” casing.

Use the proper “GitHub” casing in the heading for consistency.

-### Github workflows
+### GitHub workflows

29-33: Nit: Standardize “PyTorch” casing in headings.

Minor consistency tweak for section headers.

-## TensorRT-LLM Pytorch - Modules
+## TensorRT-LLM PyTorch - Modules
...
-## TensorRT-LLM Pytorch Models
+## TensorRT-LLM PyTorch Models
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90145cf and 915eda4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (12)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: galagam
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6487
File: tests/unittest/_torch/auto_deploy/unit/singlegpu/test_ad_trtllm_bench.py:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, test files (files under tests/ directories) do not require NVIDIA copyright headers, unlike production source code files. Test files typically start directly with imports, docstrings, or code.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learnt from: galagam
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6487
File: tests/unittest/_torch/auto_deploy/unit/singlegpu/test_ad_trtllm_bench.py:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, test files (files under tests/ directories) do not require NVIDIA copyright headers, unlike production source code files. Test files typically start directly with imports, docstrings, or code.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learnt from: moraxu
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6303
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/examples_test_list.txt:494-494
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM testing, it's common to have both CLI flow tests (test_cli_flow.py) and PyTorch API tests (test_llm_api_pytorch.py) for the same model. These serve different purposes: CLI flow tests validate the traditional command-line workflow, while PyTorch API tests validate the newer LLM API backend. Both are legitimate and should coexist.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-01T15:14:45.673Z
Learnt from: yibinl-nvidia
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6506
File: examples/models/core/mixtral/requirements.txt:3-3
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T15:14:45.673Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, examples directory can have different dependency versions than the root requirements.txt file. Version conflicts between root and examples dependencies are acceptable because examples are designed to be standalone and self-contained.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#0
File: CODING_GUIDELINES.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{cpp,h,hpp,cc,cxx,cu,py} : All TensorRT-LLM Open Source Software code should contain an NVIDIA copyright header that includes the current year. This includes .cpp, .h, .cu, .py, and any other source files which are compiled or interpreted.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-07-22T09:22:14.726Z
Learnt from: yechank-nvidia
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6254
File: tensorrt_llm/_torch/pyexecutor/model_engine.py:1201-1204
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T09:22:14.726Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM's multimodal processing pipeline, shared tensor recovery using `from_shared_tensor()` is only needed during the context phase. Generation requests reuse the already-recovered tensor data and only need to call `strip_for_generation()` to remove unnecessary multimodal data while preserving the recovered tensors. This avoids redundant tensor recovery operations during generation.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-08T05:06:31.537Z
Learnt from: sklevtsov-nvidia
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#3294
File: cpp/tensorrt_llm/cutlass_extensions/include/cutlass_extensions/epilogue/fusion/sm90_visitor_scatter.hpp:36-36
Timestamp: 2025-08-08T05:06:31.537Z
Learning: CUTLASS extension files (under cpp/tensorrt_llm/cutlass_extensions/) follow CUTLASS coding style conventions, including using #pragma once instead of TRTLLM_ prefixed header guards, even though they are .hpp files.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#0
File: CODING_GUIDELINES.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{h,hpp} : Use a preprocessor guard in header files. The guard name must have prefix TRTLLM_ followed by the filename, all in caps, and no trailing underscore.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-08T04:10:18.987Z
Learnt from: djns99
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6728
File: cpp/tensorrt_llm/plugins/mixtureOfExperts/mixtureOfExpertsPlugin.cpp:966-966
Timestamp: 2025-08-08T04:10:18.987Z
Learning: TensorRT plugins currently don't support padding functionality, and TensorRT is not getting new features (in maintenance mode). This means that duplicating parameters like mExpertHiddenSize in function calls, even with TODO comments, can be acceptable as pragmatic solutions within these constraints.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-07-22T08:33:49.109Z
Learnt from: yiqingy0
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#5198
File: jenkins/mergeWaiveList.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T08:33:49.109Z
Learning: In the TensorRT-LLM waive list merging system, removed lines are always located at the end of the merge waive lists, which is why the mergeWaiveList.py script uses reverse traversal - it's an optimization for this specific domain constraint.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-07-17T09:01:27.402Z
Learnt from: amitz-nv
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#5616
File: tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py:375-384
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T09:01:27.402Z
Learning: In tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py, the LoRA adapter cache optimization logic that checks `is_adapter_in_cpu_cache()` and conditionally passes None for weights/config has a known race condition issue that cannot be solved with simple error handling or verification checks. This is a known limitation that requires a more comprehensive solution.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#0
File: CODING_GUIDELINES.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T21:22:55.018Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{cpp,h,hpp,cc,cxx} : Use the LLVM clang-format tool for formatting C++ code before submitting a PR.

Applied to files:

  • .github/CODEOWNERS
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/CODEOWNERS (3)

9-17: Infra grouping looks good and clearer.

The CI/Setup/GitHub workflows consolidation improves maintainability; owners are explicit and anchored to repo root paths.


18-24: Docs and Triton backend sections: clear and scoped.

Nice consolidation of /docs, /examples, and /triton_backend under dedicated owners.


9-24: CODEOWNERS Duplicate Path Check Passed

All seven paths (/.github, /.coderabbit.yaml, /jenkins, /docker, /docs, /examples, /triton_backend) appear exactly once in .github/CODEOWNERS, so there are no accidental overrides later in the file.

Signed-off-by: Venky Ganesh <23023424+venkywonka@users.noreply.github.com>
@venkywonka venkywonka changed the title [TRTLLM-7025] [infra] Reorganize CODEOWNERS file for clarity and maintainability [TRTLLM-7025] [infra] Reorganize CODEOWNERS to rectify examples mapping Aug 8, 2025
@venkywonka
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/bot skip --comment "does not affect L0 or other tests"

@venkywonka venkywonka enabled auto-merge (squash) August 8, 2025 21:13
@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #14647 [ skip ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #14647 [ skip ] completed with state SUCCESS
Skipping testing for commit 6f6a429

@venkywonka venkywonka merged commit efcb8f7 into NVIDIA:main Aug 8, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants