Mention limits of concurrency#3307
Conversation
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
TylerMSFT
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, @AlexGuteniev. I appreciate the Microsoft-specific updates.
Could you smooth the sentences out a little bit. They sound fragmentary. For example, instead of "Maximums number of chunks..." it would help if you wrote "The maximum number of chunks..." This pattern should be repeated everywhere that you have a fragmentary sentence, e.g. "Number of concurrent threads is..." could be "The number of concurrent threads is...", etc.
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@TylerMSFT, I tried, but may still don't get it right. My native language doesn't have the feature. |
TylerMSFT
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's good. Thank you. One final thing: could you update the ms.date of the changed files to reflect that they've been updated. Then I'll sign off. Really appreciate you doing this work.
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
TylerMSFT
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@AlexGuteniev - thank you very much for your excellent contribution to the Microsoft standard library docs!
|
#sign-off |
|
@ktoliver : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@ktoliver : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@ktoliver : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
Mention limits of concurrency. See microsoft/STL#2099