Skip to content

Updating styling of PR description page - #763

Merged
Rachel Macfarlane (RMacfarlane) merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
rmacfarlane/webview-styling
Jan 7, 2019
Merged

Updating styling of PR description page#763
Rachel Macfarlane (RMacfarlane) merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
rmacfarlane/webview-styling

Conversation

@RMacfarlane

@RMacfarlane Rachel Macfarlane (RMacfarlane) commented Dec 21, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Now it looks like this:

new-style

instead of

old-style

@RMacfarlane Rachel Macfarlane (RMacfarlane) changed the title improve the boxes Updating styling of PR description page Dec 21, 2018
@NavyAdmiral

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rachel Macfarlane (@RMacfarlane) #354 Can this be addressed within this PR? I believe it would make the PR page look better.

@rebornix

Peng Lyu (rebornix) commented Jan 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It looks much better than before, great work!

My only concern is Author infos of single comments stand out too much right now

image

since we stop showing separators between single comments, Author info looks similar to comments and as Author avatar is large, it stands out more than the real comments. Probably we can shrink it a little bit like what .com does.

@RMacfarlane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I decreased the size of the author information in review comments, and added the right indent back again:

screen shot 2019-01-04 at 10 05 35 am

NavyAdmiral I'll take a look into that soon, but I think it's outside the scope of this PR

@rebornix Peng Lyu (rebornix) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@RMacfarlane
Rachel Macfarlane (RMacfarlane) deleted the rmacfarlane/webview-styling branch January 7, 2019 23:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants