@emar-kar I left the location argument in a few places in the samples where I thought we want to keep it to demonstrate its use cases (e.g. explicitly setting the location of a new dataset).

@emar-kar Any chance of merging this? This way we avoid potential merge conflicts when you guys make any changes to the new-samples branch.

Thanks! :)

@plamut I think you need to ask Tim Swast for the review first. He should confirm that the location parameter should be deleted not only at the query methods. And I assume he will ask to merge this PR directly into google-cloud-python repo, instead of double merge through another PR.

@emar-kar Since my set of changes is more trivial, I'm fine with waiting until the new-samples branch is merged in the main repo. Will be easier to resolve any further merge conflicts on my side.

I'm fine reviewing this PR here now that I found it in my notifications. :-)