Skip to content

docs(modules): reconcile marketplace v1 citations with merged HT-79 charter (HT-79) #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
zaridan merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

docs(modules): reconcile marketplace v1 citations with merged HT-79 charter (HT-79) #92

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
45 changes: 34 additions & 11 deletions specs/modules/marketplace-v1.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ component of Phase 3, built now and proven first as the project's own dogfood in
path — not deferred to "once demand justifies it") and `specs/modules/catalog.md` §5,
the additive contract this spec is built to satisfy exactly.

**Sequencing note.** The HT-79 charter amendment (`docs/ht-79-marketplace-timing`,
commit `d8bd2d4`) is pushed but not yet merged to `main` as of this draft. This spec
cites the amended §3/§4/§5 text throughout; if that PR's wording changes before merge,
re-check the citations below against the merged text before this spec is accepted.
**Citation basis.** The HT-79 charter amendment merged to `main` as PR #86, commit
`b528971`. Every CHARTER.md citation below was re-verified against that merged text
on 2026-07-19; the draft's earlier provisional citations no longer stand on an
unmerged branch.

## 1. Purpose & scope

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -607,11 +607,14 @@ dependencies" quietly become a catch-all label for anything pre-launch.
| Privacy policy for the store | Counsel-drafted | Same gate (real customer PII starts flowing at first live charge) | Same |
| **Stripe Tax enabled** (automated EU VAT / US sales-tax calculation and remittance on Checkout Sessions) | Compliance/finance configuration, not counsel-drafted | Same gate — charging real customers across jurisdictions without correct tax handling is its own launch blocker | Not pre-dogfood — Stripe test mode carries no real tax obligation. Which jurisdictions to register in first is decision point §10.9 |

CHARTER.md §7's plugin exception counsel deadline (referenced above in this spec's
§3, unchanged by the HT-79 amendment) stays separate and earlier: before the first
external code contribution — unaffected by this spec, since every v1 marketplace
Module is out-of-process and needs no exception (charter amendment text, quoted in
full in CHARTER.md).
The plugin exception's counsel deadline — set in CHARTER.md §3's module boundary,
where "§7" names the *AGPL-3.0* §7 additional permission, not a CHARTER.md section —
stays separate and earlier: before the first external contribution is accepted. The
HT-79 amendment left it unchanged, and this spec does not touch it, since every v1
marketplace Module is out-of-process and needs no exception. The merged amendment
says so directly: *"The §7 plugin exception's counsel deadline is unchanged (before
first external contribution): every v1 marketplace module is out-of-process and needs
no exception."*

## 9. Non-goals v1

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -682,8 +685,9 @@ spec's honest deliverable on that front, not a silent scope-down.
*payment and entitlement* but not its Release/tarball/Vercel-deploy mechanics
for *delivery*. Consequence: this spec's pipeline is scoped to
running-service-shaped modules only, and the **actual launch catalog becomes
draft-assistant-led**, not the KB-plus-AI-modules lineup CHARTER.md's Phase 3
text currently implies — a real narrowing of that text, not a wording nuance.
draft-assistant-led**, not the KB-plus-AI-modules lineup CHARTER.md's amended
Phase 3 text now names outright — a real narrowing of that text, not a wording
nuance.
- **(b) Generalize this pipeline to carry content-as-code artifacts too** — e.g. a
Release's `tarball_storage_path` can point at a static-build output or a docs
source bundle instead of a deployable service, consumed by a different (not yet
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -804,3 +808,22 @@ spec's honest deliverable on that front, not a silent scope-down.
verified by running `markdownlint-cli2` locally with only MD040 enabled (the
vanilla default ruleset's other findings, e.g. MD013 line-length, do not reflect
what this repo's CI/CodeRabbit actually enforces and were left alone).
- **2026-07-19** (HT-79, post-merge citation reconciliation — docs-only, no
substantive change): the HT-79 charter amendment merged as PR #86 (`b528971`), so
the draft's sequencing note — which flagged the amendment as pushed-but-unmerged
and asked for a re-check before acceptance — was discharged and replaced with a
citation basis recording the merged commit. All CHARTER.md citations re-verified
against the merged §3/§4/§5 text: the launch-day Phase 3 claim (§1), the
marks-and-marketplace asset list (§1), the amendment's verbatim counsel-items
sentence (§8), the Phase 3 launch lineup and content-as-code KB description
(§10.4) all check out as written. **One mis-citation corrected** (§8): the plugin
exception's counsel deadline was attributed to "CHARTER.md §7," but CHARTER.md §7
is Governance — the deadline is set in CHARTER.md §3's module boundary, and "§7"
there names the AGPL-3.0 §7 additional permission. The parenthetical pointing at
"this spec's §3" was dangling for the same reason (this spec's §3 is Service
architecture and never mentions the exception); both replaced with a direct quote
of the merged amendment. **One wording tightening** (§10.4): the KB-plus-AI-modules
lineup was described as what Phase 3 "currently implies" — the amended text names
those modules outright, which strengthens rather than weakens the conflict that
decision point raises. Status deliberately left at **draft for TJ review**;
accepting the spec remains TJ's call.
Loading