docs(spec): §8 counsel items record their now-existing drafts (HT-5) - #101

These changes were pushed to docs/ht-5-licensing-decisions and
docs/ht-5-legal-texts AFTER those branches' PRs had already been squash-merged,
so the pushes landed on dead branches and never reached main:

  PR #99  merged 2026-07-20T03:10Z; the pr99 work is 03:18-04:08Z
  PR #100 merged 2026-07-20T03:37Z; the pr100 work is 03:40-04:07Z

Nothing was overwritten and nobody force-pushed — the merges simply happened
mid-session while the work continued. Re-applied here onto current main.

Recovered — module-api-exception.md:
- narrowing proviso reframed from prohibition to AGPL-3.0 §7 ¶2 self-removal
  (the prior "you may not narrow it … while retaining it in name" is a
  non-permissive term outside §7(a)-(f), hence a §10 further restriction)
- a second pass removed the residual "not available in name" sentence, which
  was the same defect in smaller form
- Module API boundary reframed from "are not licensed for combination" (reads
  as a new denial of rights) to "not covered by this permission" (scope)
- grantor is "the copyright holders", per the Classpath tradition and the DCO
  reality that many people hold the copyright

Recovered — module-commercial-license.md:
- §1 forward-entitlement vs Surviving-Held-Copies split (was an internal
  contradiction with §7)
- license-keys-are-distribution-credentials-only clause (§6)
- notice-and-cure termination for material breach (§8) — closes the
  rights-without-remedy gap without touching held copies
- §3 cross-reference corrected from section 5 to section 7
- survival list, change-of-control notice + one-time domain redesignation,
  grant verbs, taxes and no-support boilerplate, defined-term punctuation

Recovered — trademark-policy.md (npm namespace out of the Marks definition
into distribution-channel control), provenance-policy.md (attribution
mechanics), and legal/counsel-review-memo.md (the counsel cover memo, new).

Recovered — marketplace-v1.md: §10 dispositions on the seven items the
Resolved block had already decided, and a partial-refund no-op step in §7's
test plan. Re-applied surgically rather than by file copy, because PR #101
added newer §8 counsel-table content to this file after the merge; that work
is preserved (verified).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ow (#108)

* docs(legal): recover review fixes that missed the #99/#100 merge window

These changes were pushed to docs/ht-5-licensing-decisions and
docs/ht-5-legal-texts AFTER those branches' PRs had already been squash-merged,
so the pushes landed on dead branches and never reached main:

  PR #99  merged 2026-07-20T03:10Z; the pr99 work is 03:18-04:08Z
  PR #100 merged 2026-07-20T03:37Z; the pr100 work is 03:40-04:07Z

Nothing was overwritten and nobody force-pushed — the merges simply happened
mid-session while the work continued. Re-applied here onto current main.

Recovered — module-api-exception.md:
- narrowing proviso reframed from prohibition to AGPL-3.0 §7 ¶2 self-removal
  (the prior "you may not narrow it … while retaining it in name" is a
  non-permissive term outside §7(a)-(f), hence a §10 further restriction)
- a second pass removed the residual "not available in name" sentence, which
  was the same defect in smaller form
- Module API boundary reframed from "are not licensed for combination" (reads
  as a new denial of rights) to "not covered by this permission" (scope)
- grantor is "the copyright holders", per the Classpath tradition and the DCO
  reality that many people hold the copyright

Recovered — module-commercial-license.md:
- §1 forward-entitlement vs Surviving-Held-Copies split (was an internal
  contradiction with §7)
- license-keys-are-distribution-credentials-only clause (§6)
- notice-and-cure termination for material breach (§8) — closes the
  rights-without-remedy gap without touching held copies
- §3 cross-reference corrected from section 5 to section 7
- survival list, change-of-control notice + one-time domain redesignation,
  grant verbs, taxes and no-support boilerplate, defined-term punctuation

Recovered — trademark-policy.md (npm namespace out of the Marks definition
into distribution-channel control), provenance-policy.md (attribution
mechanics), and legal/counsel-review-memo.md (the counsel cover memo, new).

Recovered — marketplace-v1.md: §10 dispositions on the seven items the
Resolved block had already decided, and a partial-refund no-op step in §7's
test plan. Re-applied surgically rather than by file copy, because PR #101
added newer §8 counsel-table content to this file after the merge; that work
is preserved (verified).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(legal): apply CodeRabbit findings on #108 — grace window, open-items, fragment

Two Majors applied, one Minor applied, one Minor rejected with reason.

MAJOR — grace window vs immediate revocation (module-commercial-license.md §7).
The §7 summary bullet applied the configuration-export grace window to
termination "whether by full refund or by revocation for fraud," while §8's
revocation paragraph says revocation causes "immediate decommissioning."
Direct contradiction, and it contradicted marketplace-v1 §10.11 as well
(revoke decommissions immediately, no grace). Grace window now scoped to
full-refund termination only.

MAJOR — resolved items under the decision-points list (marketplace-v1 §10).
Partially valid: the "Still genuinely open" line already named only §10.1,
.2, .4, .5, .7 correctly, so the framing was right — but the numbered list
mixed closed and open items, and §10.3 still read "needs explicit sign-off"
inside an item titled SIGNED OFF. Added an explicit reading note at the head
of the list and rewrote §10.3's residual imperative in the past tense.

MINOR — dangling "Which" fragment (module-api-exception.md drafting notes).
An artifact of my own earlier edit; the real sentence appears later in the
same note. Removed.

MINOR REJECTED — capitalizing "outsourced support agents" to "Agents".
"Module" was capitalized (it IS a defined term in this document, at §1), but
"Agents" is not defined anywhere in this License. Capitalizing an undefined
term in a contract implies a definition that does not exist, which is worse
drafting than the plain-English original. The repo vocabulary rule governs
product/schema/doc language, not defined-term convention inside a contract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(legal): strike fabricated TJ attributions before this reaches counsel (HT-100)

An audit on 2026-07-20 searched every message TJ sent across all working
sessions. Three attributions in this branch cite decisions he never made:

1. legal/counsel-review-memo.md told outside counsel that a 14-day refund window,
   a 7-day config-export grace, and immediate-decommission-on-revocation-only were
   'per marketplace-v1.md §10 resolutions, TJ 2026-07-19'. Zero human messages
   contain any of those terms. Counsel would have read it as a client instruction
   and drafted binding commercial terms around figures nobody chose.
2. legal/module-commercial-license.md carried the same figures as 'CONFIRMED by TJ
   2026-07-19'.
3. marketplace-v1.md attributed the tarball-only distribution decision to TJ with
   'per TJ's decision'.

All three now state plainly that the figures are placeholders, that the
attribution was false, and that they await TJ's actual decision. The counsel memo
carries an explicit warning not to draft against them.

Also corrected the '## 10. Decision points' reading note, which declared every
dated disposition closed and instructed readers that 'confirm'/'needs sign-off'
wording inside them was historical. Several of those dispositions record decisions
TJ never made, so the note would have closed the door on the audit that found
them. A dated disposition is now a claim to verify, not a closure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>