Missing domain and range attributes in the MeSH ontology/vocabulary? #181
Description
The Concepts documentation provides the following table for the relationships between the meshv:Concept class and other classes:
| Subject | Predicate | Object | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | meshv:Concept | meshv:broaderConcept | meshv:Concept |
| 2 | meshv:Concept | meshv:narrowerConcept | meshv:Concept |
| 3 | meshv:Concept | meshv:preferredTerm | meshv:Term |
| 4 | meshv:Concept | meshv:term | meshv:Term |
| 5 | meshv:Concept | meshv:relatedConcept | meshv:Concept |
However, in the vocabulary_1.0.0.ttl file provided, the relationships between meshv:Concept and meshv:Term are not covered.
If we add the following rdfs:domain attributes to meshv:preferredTerm
<http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#preferredTerm> rdf:type :ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:label "preferredTerm" ;
rdfs:comment "Relates Concepts, Descriptors, Qualifiers or SupplementaryConceptRecords to Terms. Indicates that the Term is the preferred term for a Concept, Descriptor, Qualifier, or SupplementaryConceptRecord." ;
dct:description "Relates Concepts, Descriptors, Qualifiers or SupplementaryConceptRecords to Terms. Indicates that the Term is the preferred term for a Concept, Descriptor, Qualifier, or SupplementaryConceptRecord." ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#term> ;
rdfs:domain <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#Concept> ;
rdfs:domain <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#Descriptor> ;
rdfs:domain <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#Qualifier> ;
rdfs:domain <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#SupplementaryConceptRecord> ;
rdfs:range <http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#Term> .
Then the relationship on row 3 is covered (along with the other Subject/Object relationships described by meshv:preferredTerm).
This following visualisation might also help:
I'm wondering if this was intentional? If not, I'd be happy to open a PR and add these missing relationships to the ontology.