Skip to content

Typo s/custop/custom/ #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Froussios merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2015
Merged

Typo s/custop/custom/ #15

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Part 3 - Taming the sequence/7. Custom operators.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

RxJava offers a very large [operator set](http://reactivex.io/RxJava/javadoc/rx/Observable.html). Counting all the overloads, the number of operators on Rx is over 300. A smaller number of those is essential, meaning that you cannot achieve an Rx implementation without them. Many are there just for convenience and a self-descriptive name. For example, if `source.First(user -> user.isOnline())` didn't exist, we would still be able to do `source.filter(user -> user.isOnline()).First()`.

Despite many convenience operators, the operator set of RxJava is still very basic. Rx offers the building blocks that you can combine into anything, but eventually you will want to define reuseable code for repeated cases. In standard Java, this would be done with custom classes and methods. In Rx, you would like the ability to design custop operators. For example, calculating a running average from a sequence of numbers may be very common in your financial application. That doesn't already exist in `Observable`, but you can make it yourself:
Despite many convenience operators, the operator set of RxJava is still very basic. Rx offers the building blocks that you can combine into anything, but eventually you will want to define reuseable code for repeated cases. In standard Java, this would be done with custom classes and methods. In Rx, you would like the ability to design custom operators. For example, calculating a running average from a sequence of numbers may be very common in your financial application. That doesn't already exist in `Observable`, but you can make it yourself:

```java
class AverageAcc {
Expand Down