fix a bug in generalize for large deviations#99
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
With this fix if maxDeviation = 1.6 and bRemoveDegenerateParts = false, an empty polygon is returned. If maxDeviation = 1.5 and bRemoveDegenerateParts = false, the correct degenerate polygon is returned. |
Member
Author
|
@alocke Could you check this install, if it fixes the issue you found? |
Member
|
No, it doesn't work. If maxDeviation = 1.6 and bRemoveDegenerateParts = false, an empty polygon is returned. |
Member
Author
|
@alocke Strange. I've added a unit test that demonstrates that this should work. Although, it does not use the original data. |
Member
|
Oops, my build was messed up. Looks good. |
stolstov
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2015
fix a bug in generalize for large deviations
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A fix for issue #98
@FalconIA